Issue #1034 has been updated by headius (Charles Nutter). This was an artifact of 1.8's interpreter. It should be fixed (which would be hard, since iter/blockarg wraps whatever call it goes with) if 1.8 is open or closed if it is not. ---------------------------------------- Bug #1034: Ruby 1.8 evaluates block argument out of order from other arguments and receiver https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/1034#change-32980 Author: headius (Charles Nutter) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Category: Target version: ruby -v: Ruby 1.8 =begin In Ruby 1.9 and all alternative impls I tested, block arguments are evaluated in the order they're encountered in a call. For example: a.foo(b, c, &d) The expected order would be left to right, a, then b, then c, then d. But Ruby 1.8 evaluates in the order d, a, b, c. In a case like the following (somewhat contrived) this would have odd side effects: x = 0 (x += 1; a).foo(x += 1, x += 1, &(x += 1, d)) In 1.8, the two non-block arguments would be 3, 4, while on Ruby 1.9 and other impls it would be 2, 3 as you'd expect. =end
on 2012-11-16 17:35
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.