Forum: Mongrel cannot load such file -- 1.9/http11

Hello,

I have installed the mongrel 1.2.0-pre2 gem into my project.
But when I do rake db:test:prepare I see this output :

cannot load such file -- 1.9/http11

Anyone a idea how to solve this ?

Roelof

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Roelof Wobben <rwobben@hotmail.com> 
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the mongrel 1.2.0-pre2 gem into my project.
> But when I do rake db:test:prepare I see this output :
>

http://yourbugreportneedsmore.info/

You don't say what version of Ruby, Rails and OS are you using.

> cannot load such file -- 1.9/http11
>
> Anyone a idea how to solve this ?
>

While mongrel might work under Ruby 1.9, I'm not sure it will properly
work due the changes in threads. Not to mention newer versions of
Rails.

I personally you move a rack-based web server, like Puma:

http://puma.io/

Which uses the same parser from Mongrel and follows a similar philosofy.

Cheers,
--
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupry

> >
>
> http://yourbugreportneedsmore.info/
>
> You don't say what version of Ruby, Rails and OS are you using.

I'm using on a Fedora Linux machine:

Ruby version : Ruby 1.9.3p286
Rails :  Rails 3.2.8

> I personally you move a rack-based web server, like Puma:
>
> http://puma.io/
>
> Which uses the same parser from Mongrel and follows a similar philosofy.

I will look into this. I'm using mongrel to test a website I make with 
ruby on Rails.
So it must can work with localhost instead of a real url.

Roelof

> >
> While mongrel might work under Ruby 1.9, I'm not sure it will properly
> work due the changes in threads. Not to mention newer versions of
> Rails.
>
> I personally you move a rack-based web server, like Puma:
>
> http://puma.io/
>
> Which uses the same parser from Mongrel and follows a similar philosofy.

One question : can Puma work together with Cucumber ?

Roelof

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Roelof Wobben <rwobben@hotmail.com> 
wrote:
>
> One question : can Puma work together with Cucumber ?
>

The two are completely unrelated. One is a web server while the other
is a testing/acceptance framework.

I presume you want to test with cucumber your application, right?

Cucumber will use Rack to connect to your application and test your
controllers/stuff.
(search the web if you don't know what is it)
--
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupry

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Roelof Wobben <rwobben@hotmail.com> 
wrote:
>
>
> I'm using on a Fedora Linux machine:
>
> Ruby version : Ruby 1.9.3p286
> Rails :  Rails 3.2.8
>

I will recommend you use puma.io then. Rails 3 is not properly
supported by Mongrel.

>
> I will look into this. I'm using mongrel to test a website I make with ruby
> on Rails.
> So it must can work with localhost instead of a real url.
>

All web servers work locally (listen/bind to local addresses), not
entirely sure if I follow your statement.
--
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupry

> From: luislavena@gmail.com
> > Rails :  Rails 3.2.8
>
> All web servers work locally (listen/bind to local addresses), not
> entirely sure if I follow your statement.
> --
What I ment is for mongrel to start with capabary I had to insert this 
into env.rb  Change Capybara server settingsAdd these lines to 
features/support/env.rb:


Capybara.server_port = 3001Capybara.app_host = 
"localhost:3001"Capybara.server do |app, port|  require 
'rack/handler/mongrel'  Rack::Handler::Mongrel.run(app, :Port => 
port)endMust I do the same for puma? Roelof        > Luis Lavena