FastCGI is language-independent and like cgi can serve all languages, but setting up nginx with fcgiwrap and spawn-fcgi is only used for serving Perl. Almost all tutorials and instructions use this method for Perl-FasctCGI. For serving Pythong scripts, the dominant method is uWSGI. Is there any limitation for using FastCGI for Python that it is not usual? or the reason is merely that uWSGI is better? If it is only better, how much? Why there is no such system for Perl? According to my tests, nginx FastCGI is able to fairly serve all scripting languages. Is there a problem that may happen at heavily usage? Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,231112,231112#msg-231112
on 2012-09-26 21:18
on 2012-09-27 07:14
> If it is only better, how much? Why there is no such system for Perl? > > uwsgi protocol (and the uWSGI application server) is not python specific, after python, the perl/psgi plugin is the most used behind uwsgi/uWSGI (just as an example). The uWSGI application server can speak fastcgi too, but uwsgi is preferred because it is a lot more simple to parse and to generate. From a performance point of view, there is no particular advantage. -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.