Issue #6769 has been reported by luislavena (Luis Lavena). ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) Category: misc Target version: 2.0.0 =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-07-22 03:04
on 2012-07-23 07:14
Issue #6769 has been updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA). IMO, it's okay. ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-28286 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) Category: misc Target version: 2.0.0 =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-07-24 15:33
Issue #6769 has been updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena). Assignee changed from usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) to luislavena (Luis Lavena) Thank you Usa, will work on this. ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-28391 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: misc Target version: 2.0.0 =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-10-27 00:31
Issue #6769 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada). ping. status? ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-31706 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: misc Target version: 2.0.0 =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-10-27 00:54
Issue #6769 has been updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena). ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote: > ping. > status? Replied in [ruby-core:48192], still working on a patch, might show some progress this weekend. ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-31717 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: misc Target version: 2.0.0 =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-11-24 01:45
Issue #6769 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Luis, what's the status? -- Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-33697 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: misc Target version: 2.0.0 =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-11-25 01:23
Issue #6769 has been updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena). Target version changed from 2.0.0 to next minor Sorry, was unable to work on this while still working on the other bug/issues. I'm moving this to next minor. Either way, RubyInstaller binary distributions have been doing what this ticket describes. Thank you. ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-33829 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: misc Target version: next minor =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
on 2012-11-25 01:35
Issue #6769 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Though it is better if it is implemented in this month, an accepted feature can be implemented up to code freeze (around Christmas). If you are still having difficulties, it is okay to postpone to next minor. Thanks, -- Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> ---------------------------------------- Feature #6769: rbinstall.rb: install both src and batch files separetely https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6769#change-33830 Author: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: misc Target version: next minor =begin Hello, Current behavior of rbinstall.rb is to concat bin scripts (erb, rake, rdoc, etc) along with a batchfile stub in a single file, resulting in erb.bat, rdoc.bat etc. Those files works OK when invoked directly, but they do not support the following scenarios: * Invoke it like "ruby -S rake", which looks for extension-less script in the path (and that does not exist) * Cannot invoke those scripts from another script, example, from Rake, do "ruby 'rdoc'" will not work. To circumvent this issue at RubyInstaller, we copied the original bin scripts and replaced the batchfile stubs with simple ones: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... === I would like to change rbinstall.rb to copy over verbatim bin scripts and simple batchfiles stubs. That will solve the above two issues I mentioned plus open the scenario to a easy executable-based launcher, similar to gem-exefy: https://github.com/bosko/gem-exefy To have identifiable scripts in list of process plus, customized firewall rules and remove the dreaded "Terminate batch job" prompt. Before I start working on this, I wanted to know what do you think about this? Thanks in advance for your feedback and looking forward your responses. =end
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.