I noticed that the bandwidths of benchmark_tx.py is wide and tunnel.py is narrow in the same frequency and same bit rate. I run uhd_fft on machine A, then run *./benchmark_tx.py -f 2.42G -r 1M* and *sudo ./tunnel.py -f 2.42G -r 1M* on machine B in turn. I got the uhd_fft wave as attached. Anyone can explain why it happens? And is there any way to tune the bandwidth of benchmark and tunnel?
on 2012-06-26 19:10
on 2012-06-27 01:58
On 06/26/2012 10:08 AM, Weixian Zhou wrote: > I noticed that the bandwidths of benchmark_tx.py is wide and tunnel.py is > narrow in the same frequency and same bit rate. I run uhd_fft on machine A, > then run > *./benchmark_tx.py -f 2.42G -r 1M* > and > *sudo ./tunnel.py -f 2.42G -r 1M* > on machine B in turn. I got the uhd_fft wave as attached. Anyone can > explain why it happens? And is there any way to tune the bandwidth of > benchmark and tunnel? > Perhaps there is not data for tunnel.py to transmit? In contrast, benchmark tx is constantly transmitting. -josh
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.

