Hi, Wondering what are views of people interested/using rg2 about the future (gtk3)? What do you think about girffi or a potential rg3? Thanks -- Guillaume Cottenceau
on 2011-10-21 14:38
on 2011-10-21 14:47
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 14:37, Guillaume Cottenceau <email@example.com> wrote: > Wondering what are views of people interested/using rg2 about the > future (gtk3)? What do you think about girffi or a potential rg3? I would love to see gir being used. It would probably affect our API quite a bit, however, and I guess we need manpower for such a conversion. Many of the type-conversion functions are in place, so that part should be easy to transplant.
on 2011-10-21 15:02
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 14:59, Simon Arnaud <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > There is already a gir effort for ruby gtk/gnome : > > https://github.com/mvz/ruby-gir-ffi > > I thought some devs knew it already, but I'm not sure now. > > I didn't try it, but it seems very barebone and C'ish. It would not be > too hard imo to make it behave much like rg2. I know about it and yes, it’s very must like programming C in Ruby. We can surely learn something from it, but as far as I’ve seen there’s not much we can use.
on 2011-10-24 02:44