Forum: NGINX IMAP Proxy?

Posted by Phillip Oldham (Guest)
on 2010-08-31 16:07
(Received via mailing list)
Can nginx be used as a proxy for IMAP, so that multiple users can
connect to nginx but the proxied server only sees one connection? If so,
how would this be configured?

Background: We have 20 users who all need access to read/move emails in
a single IMAP mailbox, however our current hosting company is limiting
our connections to one "user" per IP, or around 10 connections (since
most mail clients open multiple connections to the server).
--

*Phillip B Oldham*
ActivityHQ
phill@activityhq.com <mailto:phill@theactivitypeople.co.uk>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Policies*

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
recipient(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in
error, please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. No action
should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to 
anyone.

This e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is
not a 100% secure communications medium, and we have taken steps to
ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus. We must
advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should
ensure they are completely virus free, and that you understand and
observe the lack of security when e-mailing us.
Posted by unknown (Guest)
on 2010-08-31 16:25
(Received via mailing list)
>   Can nginx be used as a proxy for IMAP, so that multiple users can
> connect to nginx but the proxied server only sees one connection? If so,
> how would this be configured?
>
> Background: We have 20 users who all need access to read/move emails in
> a single IMAP mailbox, however our current hosting company is limiting
> our connections to one "user" per IP, or around 10 connections (since
> most mail clients open multiple connections to the server).


IMAP is not designed to handle that, AFAIK.
It's a ...not-so-great... idea to begin with.
Why do 20 users have to fuzz around a single mailbox?


Rainer
Posted by Phillip Oldham (Guest)
on 2010-08-31 16:33
(Received via mailing list)
On 31/08/2010 15:24, rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> It's a ...not-so-great... idea to begin with.
> Why do 20 users have to fuzz around a single mailbox?

Customer receive an automated email and respond manually. Our staff need
to be able to review those emails and act accordingly. Was working fine
with a smaller team, but we've recently increased the staff due to
response volumes.

--

*Phillip B Oldham*
ActivityHQ
phill@activityhq.com <mailto:phill@theactivitypeople.co.uk>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Policies*

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
recipient(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in
error, please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. No action
should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to 
anyone.

This e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is
not a 100% secure communications medium, and we have taken steps to
ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus. We must
advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should
ensure they are completely virus free, and that you understand and
observe the lack of security when e-mailing us.
Posted by unknown (Guest)
on 2010-08-31 17:20
(Received via mailing list)
>>
>> IMAP is not designed to handle that, AFAIK.
>> It's a ...not-so-great... idea to begin with.
>> Why do 20 users have to fuzz around a single mailbox?
>
> Customer receive an automated email and respond manually. Our staff need
> to be able to review those emails and act accordingly. Was working fine
> with a smaller team, but we've recently increased the staff due to
> response volumes.


Get a ticketing system.
Like RT3 from bestpractical.com
Totally off-topic, I know - but IMHO, nginx is really the wrong tool for
what you are trying to achieve.
IMAP-proxies are usually used in situations where the client is a
webserver...
I know you want an "easy" solution for your problem - but RT3 is really 
as
close as you can get.


Rainer
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account (Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.