My question MIGHT be "ActiveRecord play nice with multiple views into a
table?
I ask because my application has a single DateDimension table (heavily
ornamented date objects). Each SalesFact has TWO foreign keys into the
DateDimension table: one for the date a house went on the market, one
for when it was sold [*].
My first model+schema is shown below, but I'm stymied how to construct a
query that joins the SalesFact table with the Dimension tables. More
specifically, how do you craft a :select that includes on_market_date
and a sale_date, since they're both foreign keys into the same
date_dimension table? Extra points if you can do it all with
associations and not drop down into SQL.
If that's not possible, I'm pretty sure I can create multiple views of
DateDimension to eliminate the ambiguity. But if there's a more RoR'ish
way to do this, I'm all ears.
# ===== the models...
class SalesFact < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :address_dimension
belongs_to :on_market_date_dimension
belongs_to :sale_date_dimension
end
class AddressDimension < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :sales_facts
end
class DateDimension < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class OnMarketDateDimension < DateDimension
has_many :sales_facts
end
class SaleDateDimension < DateDimension
has_many :sales_facts
end
# ===== and the schema...
create_table "sales_facts", :id => false, :force => true do |t|
t.integer "address_dimension_id"
t.integer "on_market_date_dimension_id"
t.integer "sale_date_dimension_id"
t.float "asking_price"
t.float "sale_price"
end
create_table "address_dimensions", :force => true do |t|
t.string "house_number"
t.string "street_name"
... lots and lots of other fields
t.float "latitude"
t.float "longitude"
t.string "postal_code"
end
create_table "date_dimension", :force => true do |t|
t.datetime "datetime"
t.boolean "is_weekend"
t.boolean "is_holiday"
... lots and lots of other fields
t.string "day_name"
t.string "month_name"
t.integer "quarter"
end
# =====
[*] NOTE: Many people say "why don't you just put the two dates directly
into the SalesFact table?" Rather than tilt at that windmill, I'll
simply offer two pointers on the topic:
http://philip.greenspun.com/sql/data-warehousing.html (excellent
intro)
http://www.kimballgroup.com/html/booksDWT2.html (from the man
himself)
on 2010-03-10 02:59
on 2010-03-10 23:05
Well first of all are you 100% sure you need OnMarketDateDimension and SaleDateDimension classes? If you don't have any custom logic in them you should probably remove them and change associations a bit: class SalesFact < ActiveRecord::Base ... belongs_to :on_market_date_dimension, :class_name => 'DateDimension', :foreign_key => 'on_market_date_dimension_id' belongs_to :sale_date_dimension, :class_name => 'DateDimension', :foreign_key => 'sale_date_dimension_id' end And I see no reason why you can't just do: SalesFact.first :include => [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension]. Or did I misinterpret what you need?
on 2010-03-11 00:32
# ===== the models... class SalesFact < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :address_dimension belongs_to :on_market_date_dimension belongs_to :market, :class_name => 'SaleDateDimension', :foreign_key => 'on_market_date_dimension_id' belongs_to :sale, :class_name => 'SaleDateDimension', :foreign_key => 'sale_date_dimension_id' end class SaleDateDimension < DateDimension ###has_many :sales_facts has_many :market, :class_name => 'SalesFact' has_many :sale, :class_name => 'SalesFact' end With that defined, in your views, etc., you can say something like x = SalesFact.find(:id) y = x.market.day_name Hope this is what you're looking for.
on 2010-03-11 05:54
Andrius Chamentauskas wrote: > Well first of all are you 100% sure you need OnMarketDateDimension and > SaleDateDimension classes? If you don't have any custom logic in them > you should probably remove them and change associations a bit: > class SalesFact < ActiveRecord::Base > ... > belongs_to :on_market_date_dimension, :class_name => > 'DateDimension', :foreign_key => 'on_market_date_dimension_id' > belongs_to :sale_date_dimension, :class_name => > 'DateDimension', :foreign_key => 'sale_date_dimension_id' > end > > And I see no reason why you can't just do: SalesFact.first :include => > [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension]. Or did I > misinterpret what you need? Andrius: I your solution is very close. I agree that it does not make sense to create OnMarketDateDimension and SalesDateDimension classes (or sql views onto a table, as I was suggesting). I've knocked together a project implementing your approach, but I haven't grok'ed how to make a query -- maybe you can help. If I try this: SalesFact.first(:include => [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension]) I get an un-embellished SalesFact, which doesn't do me much good -- I'd like join with the two dates to which it refers. If I try the same thing with a :select: SalesFact.first(:select => 'sales_facts.*, on_market_date_dimensions.*, sale_date_dimensions.*', :include => [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension]) I get an SQL error because Rails is generating a query based on "sales_fact.id", which we intentionally suppressed in the schema (:id => false). So my question: Given a SalesFact (or a group of SalesFacts), what's the AR.find() syntax for a query that does a join against :on_market_date_dimension and :sale_date_dimension? Thanks in advance...
on 2010-03-11 06:52
A bit more info after poking around. The following query doesn't work: SalesFact.first( :select => 'sales_facts.asking_price, on_market_date_dimensions.datetime, sale_date_dimensions.datetime, address_dimensions.street_name', :joins => [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension, :address_dimension]) (i.e. a three-way join on the three foreign keys of a SalesFact record, and only selecting specific columns in the result). Here's the SQL it generates, which fails because there is no on_market_date_dimensions table: SELECT sales_facts.asking_price, on_market_date_dimensions.datetime, sale_date_dimensions.datetime, address_dimensions.street_name FROM `sales_facts` INNER JOIN `date_dimensions` ON `date_dimensions`.id = `sales_facts`.on_market_date_dimension_id INNER JOIN `date_dimensions` sale_date_dimensions_sales_facts ON `sale_date_dimensions_sales_facts`.id = `sales_facts`.sale_date_dimension_id INNER JOIN `address_dimensions` ON `address_dimensions`.id = `sales_facts`.address_dimension_id LIMIT 1 I thought the point of @Andrius's approach was to give the model enough info so that it would refer to the date_dimension table and not the (non-existent) on_market_date_dimension table.
on 2010-03-11 20:54
Just do SalesFact.first(:include => [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension]). Then you can access dates with sales_fact.on_market_date_dimension and sales_fact.sale_date_dimension.
on 2010-03-11 21:08
Andrius Chamentauskas wrote: > Just do SalesFact.first(:include => > [:on_market_date_dimension, :sale_date_dimension]). Then you can > access dates with sales_fact.on_market_date_dimension and > sales_fact.sale_date_dimension. Ah - yes, that would work! But am I wrong in thinking that pushes all the logic out of the DB and into Rails? For example, consider the following query that shows only sales that closed in Q1: SELECT sale.asking_price, sale.sale_price, listed.datetime AS listed_date, sold.datetime AS sold_date FROM sales_facts sale JOIN date_dimensions listed ON listed.id = sale.on_market_date_dimension_id JOIN date_dimensions sold ON sold.id = sale.sale_date_dimension_id AND sold.quarter = "Q1"; If I do an :include, I'm not sure how to keep the sold.quarter = "Q1" within SQL. I'm probably missing something... P.S.: I've re-framed this question in http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/205883 -- perhaps it's clearer there?
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.