Hi Eric Hodel,
Currently, a test of rubygems reports false error on my environment
that rake is not installed into PATH.
Could you commit the patch, or may I?
$ make test-all
TESTS=test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb
./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb
./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb"
test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb
Loaded suite ./test/runner
Started
E..
Finished in 0.630337 seconds.
1) Error:
test_execute_prerelease(TestGemCommandsUninstallCommand):
Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError: ERROR: Failed to build gem native
extension.
/home/mame/work/ruby/ruby mkrf_conf.rb
rake RUBYARCHDIR=/tmp/test_rubygems_13065/gemhome/gems/pre-2.b/lib
RUBYLIBDIR=/tmp/test_rubygems_13065/gemhome/gems/pre-2.b/lib
sh: rake: command not found
Gem files will remain installed in
/tmp/test_rubygems_13065/gemhome/gems/pre-2.b for inspection.
Results logged to
/tmp/test_rubygems_13065/gemhome/gems/pre-2.b/ext/a/gem_make.out
/home/mame/work/ruby/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb:68:in
`block in test_execute_prerelease'
/home/mame/work/ruby/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb:67:in
`test_execute_prerelease'
3 tests, 12 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips
make: *** [yes-test-all] Error 1
diff --git a/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb
b/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb
index cd440f6..6113ed6 100644
--- a/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb
+++ b/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb
@@ -64,8 +64,10 @@ class TestGemCommandsUninstallCommand <
GemInstallerTestCase
util_setup_gem
- use_ui @ui do
- @installer.install
+ build_rake_in do
+ use_ui @ui do
+ @installer.install
+ end
end
@cmd.options[:args] = ["pre"]
Thanks,
on 2010-03-09 13:31
on 2010-03-24 15:11
Eric, you must reply to this ASAP! Anyone who has a direct contact to Eric, please stimulate him. I sent him a mail directly a week ago, but he does not reply. If any reply does not come in three days, I'll suggest discharging him. He is stopping many assigned tickets, including many "Urgent" ones. I'm afraid if his unresponsiveness will hinder 1.9.2 release. 2717 Bug Assigned Normal Requiring rubygems/specification causes tons of warnings for NoMethodError Eric Hodel 2010/02/12 11:19 AM 2689 Bug Assigned Normal rdoc gem on 1.9.2 fails for interactive(-i) ri Eric Hodel 2010/02/04 02:09 AM 2414 Bug Assigned Urgent make test-all does not work after gem update Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 00:59 AM 2355 Bug Assigned Urgent Please update rubygems! Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 14:06 PM 2176 Bug Assigned Urgent [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 00:58 AM 2066 Bug Assigned Normal Merge Latest RDoc/Ri Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 14:07 PM 1948 Bug Open Low RDoc Fails with Non-ASCII Pathnames Eric Hodel 2009/09/07 13:38 PM 1421 Bug Open Low Permission denied - ~/.ri Eric Hodel 2009/07/23 09:58 AM 1234 Bug Open Normal RDoc failure in benchmark/bm_so_meteor_contest.rb at or around line 542 column Eric Hodel 2009/07/23 09:39 AM 1085 Bug Assigned Urgent Got the error message, after run 'gem install --test'. Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 00:57 AM 1040 Bug Assigned Urgent rubygems/builder.rb should require user_interaction Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 00:57 AM 843 Bug Assigned Urgent RubyGems include useless libraries Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 00:57 AM 825 Bug Assigned Urgent Gem::Installer#generate_windows_script $B$N0z?t$N=gHV$,B>$H0lCW$7$J$$(B Eric Hodel 2009/12/03 00:56 AM 549 Bug Open Normal ri -f html mungles constants Eric Hodel 2009/07/23 09:25 AM 2010/3/17 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
on 2010-03-26 00:11
On Mar 16, 2010, at 08:35, Yusuke ENDOH wrote: > Hi Eric Hodel, > > Could you reply to this? >> ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb" >> >> /tmp/test_rubygems_13065/gemhome/gems/pre-2.b/ext/a/gem_make.out >> diff --git a/test/rubygems/test_gem_commands_uninstall_command.rb >> + build_rake_in do >> + use_ui @ui do >> + @installer.install >> + end >> end >> >> @cmd.options[:args] = ["pre"] Sorry, I have been busy. Please commit this patch to ruby, I have commited it to rubygems trunk.
on 2010-03-26 00:18
On Mar 24, 2010, at 07:06, Yusuke ENDOH wrote: Eric, you must reply to this ASAP! > Anyone who has a direct contact to Eric, please stimulate him. > I sent him a mail directly a week ago, but he does not reply. > > If any reply does not come in three days, I'll suggest discharging him. > He is stopping many assigned tickets, including many "Urgent" ones. > I'm afraid if his unresponsiveness will hinder 1.9.2 release. I have updated or closed as many tickets as I can. I plan to import the latest RDoc on Sunday, Pacific Time which will allow me to close five of my tickets. (I have lots of changes in it, so I'm running tests against all the gems to make sure it will work.) I would like to make a new release of RubyGems to fix some outstanding issues, but I will need another week for backwards-compatibility testing on windows. Is it acceptable to import RubyGems past the 1.9.2 freeze deadline? There are only bug fixes between 1.3.6 and RubyGems trunk.
on 2010-03-26 04:46
Hi, 2010/3/26 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>: > On Mar 24, 2010, at 07:06, Yusuke ENDOH wrote: > Eric, you must reply to this ASAP! >> Anyone who has a direct contact to Eric, please stimulate him. >> I sent him a mail directly a week ago, but he does not reply. >> >> If any reply does not come in three days, I'll suggest discharging him. >> He is stopping many assigned tickets, including many "Urgent" ones. >> I'm afraid if his unresponsiveness will hinder 1.9.2 release. > > I have updated or closed as many tickets as I can. Thank you for your replying! And forgive me for saying so rude. > I plan to import the latest RDoc on Sunday, Pacific Time which will allow me to close five of my tickets. ?(I have lots of changes in it, so I'm running tests against all the gems to make sure it will work.) > > I would like to make a new release of RubyGems to fix some outstanding issues, but I will need another week for backwards-compatibility testing on windows. What is done at 31 Mar. is just "freezing a spec". You can import the new release by 30 Apr. if the import is agreed (or preannounced by you as the maintainer, at least) by 31 Mar. Of course, ideally, it is better to explain in advance all new feature that will be in the new release. And, if the new release really has only bug fixes, you can commit it even after 30 Apr. Though, the release manager's consent is needed before each commit. So it would be better to prioritize checking "Feature" tracker tickets currently: - http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1800 - http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3010 Of course, urgent tickets should be checked soon, and if you think it is not urgent, please change the priority to high or normal. > Is it acceptable to import RubyGems past the 1.9.2 freeze deadline? ?There are only bug fixes between 1.3.6 and RubyGems trunk. In conclusion, yes, it is acceptable without problem, I think. Thank you for your consideration!
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.