I'm wanting to port over a GUI app I created into ruby so that it maintains cross platform functionality. Before I go into app specifications, I'm trying to gain an understanding of what item(s) I will need to work with GUI applications in Ruby, and more importantly, if there are any tutorials out there that can walk me through creating a simple GUI app in Ruby. I'm currently using Ruby 1.9.1, Ruby 1.8.7 EE, and Ruby 1.8.6 and can develop on windows or linux. I have no idea what gem libraries I will require. I'm willing to learn from any application before working on the porting of my own code. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
on 2010-01-19 05:17
on 2010-01-19 05:26
> I'm wanting to port over a GUI app I created into ruby so that it > maintains cross platform functionality. > > Before I go into app specifications, I'm trying to gain an understanding > of what item(s) I will need to work with GUI applications in Ruby, and > more importantly, if there are any tutorials out there that can walk me > through creating a simple GUI app in Ruby. This link might be helpful: http://wiki.github.com/rdp/ruby_talk_faq/ruby-gui-...
on 2010-01-19 05:30
On 19.01.2010 05:17, Alpha Blue wrote: > I'm wanting to port over a GUI app I created into ruby so that it > maintains cross platform functionality. > > Before I go into app specifications, I'm trying to gain an understanding > of what item(s) I will need to work with GUI applications in Ruby, and > more importantly, if there are any tutorials out there that can walk me > through creating a simple GUI app in Ruby. Well, usually just one item: the gem for the GUI library you pick to chose. :) > I'm currently using Ruby 1.9.1, Ruby 1.8.7 EE, and Ruby 1.8.6 and can > develop on windows or linux. I have no idea what gem libraries I will > require. I'm willing to learn from any application before working on > the porting of my own code. Well, I know that wxRuby[0] is 1.9.1-safe. I'm not sure about the state of things with Ruby-GNOME2[1], or Qt for Ruby[2]. From experience (with 1.8.6), I can say that Ruby-GNOME2 is quite easy to work with, but requires a lot of dependencies (bundled with the Windows installer, and resolved via package manager on Linux). Both have good documentation, and useful tutorials, though wxRuby is in the state of re-writing its documentation to reflect the changes of the recent-ish 2.0 release, but the API documentation doesn't leave anything to be desired thus far (note: under Windows install wxRuby with "--no-ri --no-rdoc" options, as it'll slurp up all of your memory), and the state for Ruby-GNOME2 is about the same. I can't say anything about the Qt bindings, however, but I expect the docs being up to the same level (all three projects are about the same age). Then there's of course JRuby which allows access to SWING (made easier with Monkeybars), and IronRuby which allows access to WinForms, but I don't know if Mono supports IronRuby / enough of WinForms for your needs. Lastly, there's Ruby's Tk bindings, but.. well, Tk is lacking in documentation and in eyecandy, but it should already be installed. Links: [0] http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/ [1] http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.jp/ [2] http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Languages/Ruby
on 2010-01-19 06:26
Thanks guys. I'll look through all of the documentation and links tomorrow morning. Take care.
on 2010-01-19 07:58
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Phillip Gawlowski wrote: > |Well, I know that wxRuby[0] is 1.9.1-safe. I'm not sure about the state > |of things with Ruby-GNOME2[1], or Qt for Ruby[2]. Qt ruby works quite well with ruby 1.9 (at least, using recent versions). Stefano
on 2010-01-19 09:04
Stefano Crocco wrote: > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Phillip Gawlowski wrote: >> |Well, I know that wxRuby[0] is 1.9.1-safe. I'm not sure about the state >> |of things with Ruby-GNOME2[1], or Qt for Ruby[2]. > > Qt ruby works quite well with ruby 1.9 (at least, using recent > versions). If you're willing to use JRuby, I highly recommend Monkeybars. > > Stefano Best, --Â Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org marnen@marnen.org
on 2010-01-19 10:25
On Jan 19, 7:57 am, Stefano Crocco <stefano.cro...@alice.it> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Phillip Gawlowski wrote: > > > |Well, I know that wxRuby[0] is 1.9.1-safe. I'm not sure about the state > > |of things with Ruby-GNOME2[1], or Qt for Ruby[2]. > > Qt ruby works quite well with ruby 1.9 (at least, using recent versions). A standard GUI should be easy to install on every platform. Tk is easy to install, Java is available every where too Qt could be better, but seems not easily available on macosx (with macport for sample) Maurice
on 2010-01-19 12:09
"Qt could be better, but seems not easily available on macosx (with macport for sample)" Qt is available on every platform (I'm probably exagerating). But surely it does on OSX, look simply their website. (The current version failed the installation at me on 10.6.2, I needed the 4.6.0) 2010/1/19 mdiam <maurice.diamantini@gmail.com>
on 2010-01-19 12:35
Phillip Gawlowski wrote: > chose. :) > >> I'm currently using Ruby 1.9.1, Ruby 1.8.7 EE, and Ruby 1.8.6 and can >> develop on windows or linux. I have no idea what gem libraries I will >> require. I'm willing to learn from any application before working on >> the porting of my own code. > <snip> > Lastly, there's Ruby's Tk bindings, but.. well, Tk is lacking in > documentation and in eyecandy, but it should already be installed. > There are actually pretty good docs here (you can hide the other languages): http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/index.html -Justin
on 2010-01-19 15:25
Today I'm going to be experimenting with the following: TK, QT, Monkeybars, and another that I found that wasn't mentioned: Titanium : http://www.appcelerator.com/ Thanks everyone. Wish me luck and I'll post back with my findings.
on 2010-01-19 16:58
Okay, doing a quick response here to my first experimentation with Titanium. It's actually an interesting development tool and has promise. I'm currently using Titanium Developer 0.8.2 on windows. The app has some interesting pieces to it. It contains the following: Packaging: Allows you to package for all OS types and also determine whether it's a network or bundled installation. The development tool does all of the packaging for you with "one click" of a button. So, packaging is a big plus in Titanium. Programming: It does allow you to program code in Ruby, Python, and PHP. With Ruby it includes the 1.8 libraries so it doesn't allow 1.9. While that's a minus, I'm more familiar with 1.8 coding than 1.9 so it's not a big thing for me. When you include Ruby into your program, you can create any ruby code in 1.8 on your own and include it into your app. You can also include all JS scripting libraries (they have all of them available). This is a big plus. Setup: Pretty simple to setup. Your project directory contains an xml file called tiapp.xml which allows you to choose how the window layouts can be altered, stretched, starting width, height, etc. and also where the root app begins. The starting app is an index.html file believe it or not. You can change this to (NameOfYourProgram.html) and then point the tiapp.xml file to the right location. Folder Structure: It's dynamic from what I see. You have a resources folder where everything is lumped and dropped into this container. However, you can change the entire structure to your own needs. You can create folders for example as ruby, scripts, images, icons and place your ruby files that you make in ruby, your js files in scripts, and all your images in images, and icons in icons for instance. Then in your app (index.html) you specify references using app://icons/myIcon.gif and it automatically knows where to find the resource. Pretty flexible so far on manipulating how you like to setup your projects. Development: This is where it's gotten interesting. I'm going to supply a quick and dirty hello world app I created using gist. http://gist.github.com/281023 As you can see, in the document, you can specify ruby code inside of script tags and just run ruby code right there. Titanium knows that it's ruby and compiles it as such. You don't have to place ruby code in there. You can specify the location of one or more ruby files and place them all throughout your app. When you package and test it (takes approx. 15 seconds total to complete) you can push a button and it says Hello World inside of your app container. Because it's html you can design your app flexibly with CSS. Pretty amazing stuff so far. I also enclosed the tiapp.xml file showing you how it lays out your app. Sandbox: There's a sandbox tab inside the development where you can throw any code structure and run it and it compiles and tests the code to see if it works properly. I think this is one of the better features because inside the sandbox you can include exactly what type of scripts you want to use, if you want to add them. So far, this is a pretty interesting development tool and I'm going to play around with it for the rest of the day.
on 2010-01-19 17:04
Bah, I forgot to include links: Getting Started with Titanium: http://www.codestrong.com/titanium/guides/get_star... Titanium API: http://www.codestrong.com/titanium/api/ Ruby Documentation: http://www.codestrong.com/titanium/guides/ruby/ enjoy.
on 2010-01-19 18:13
> A standard GUI should be easy to install on every platform. > Tk is easy to install > Java is available every where too I'd imagine that multi-platform is easier with jruby (rawr) or appcelerator or possibly tk or qt. If you want to use tk on your windows distro [and are using mingw 1.9.x] you can install it as a gem from http://github.com/rdp/tk_as_gem Also thanks for the links and review of appcelerator--I've added it to the list http://wiki.github.com/rdp/ruby_talk_faq/ruby-gui-...
on 2010-01-19 18:15
Alpha Blue schrieb: > > It rather seems you have to write the documentation yourself: http://www.codestrong.com/titanium/guides/get_star... http://www.codestrong.com/titanium/guides/get_star... --webkit btw. -roger
on 2010-01-19 20:05
Roger Pack wrote: > >> A standard GUI should be easy to install on every platform. >> Tk is easy to install >> Java is available every where too > > I'd imagine that multi-platform is easier with jruby (rawr) or > appcelerator or possibly tk or qt. > > If you want to use tk on your windows distro [and are using mingw 1.9.x] > you can install it as a gem from > > http://github.com/rdp/tk_as_gem > > Also thanks for the links and review of appcelerator--I've added it to > the list > > http://wiki.github.com/rdp/ruby_talk_faq/ruby-gui-... I tried to install this as a gem using many types of combinations: gem install tk_as_gem --platform x86-mingw32 gem install tk_as_gem --source http://github.com/rdp/tk_as_gem --platform x86-mingw32 etc. The second one fails saying it can't find a gem. The first one fails, even thought I have activetcl installed in C:\tcl and it's included in my path and verified. ERRORS: C:\Users\Joel>gem install -d tk_as_gem --platform x86-mingw32 Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing tk_as_gem: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. C:/Ruby19/bin/ruby.exe extconf.rb checking for ruby_native_thread_p() in ruby.h... yes checking for rb_errinfo() in ruby.h... yes checking for rb_safe_level() in ruby.h... yes checking for struct RArray.ptr in ruby.h... no checking for struct RArray.len in ruby.h... no checking for tcl.h... no checking for tcl.h in /usr/local/include,/usr/pkg/include,/usr/include,/Tcl/incl ude,/usr/local/include/tcl8.4,/usr/pkg/include/tcl8.4,/usr/include/tcl8.4,/Tcl/i nclude/tcl8.4,/usr/local/include/tcl8.7,/usr/pkg/include/tcl8.7,/usr/include/tcl 8.7,/Tcl/include/tcl8.7,/usr/local/include/tcl8.6,/usr/pkg/include/tcl8.6,/usr/i nclude/tcl8.6,/Tcl/include/tcl8.6,/usr/local/include/tcl8.5,/usr/pkg/include/tcl 8.5,/usr/include/tcl8.5,/Tcl/include/tcl8.5,/usr/local/include/tcl8.3,/usr/pkg/i nclude/tcl8.3,/usr/include/tcl8.3,/Tcl/include/tcl8.3,/usr/local/include/tcl8.2, /usr/pkg/include/tcl8.2,/usr/include/tcl8.2,/Tcl/include/tcl8.2,/usr/local/inclu de/tcl8.1,/usr/pkg/include/tcl8.1,/usr/include/tcl8.1,/Tcl/include/tcl8.1,/usr/l ocal/include/tcl8.0,/usr/pkg/include/tcl8.0,/usr/include/tcl8.0,/Tcl/include/tcl 8.0,/usr/local/include/tcl7.6,/usr/pkg/include/tcl7.6,/usr/include/tcl7.6,/Tcl/i nclude/tcl7.6... yes checking for tk.h... yes checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.4... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl84... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.4g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl84g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.4... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl84... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.4g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl84g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.7... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl87... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.7g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl87g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.7... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl87... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.7g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl87g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.6... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl86... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.6g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl86g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.6... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl86... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.6g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl86g... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl8.5... no checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl85... yes *** extconf.rb failed *** Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more details. You may need configuration options. Provided configuration options: --with-opt-dir --without-opt-dir --with-opt-include --without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include --with-opt-lib --without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib --with-make-prog --without-make-prog --srcdir=. --curdir --ruby=C:/Ruby19/bin/ruby --with-tcl-framework-header --without-tcl-framework-header --with-tk-framework-header --without-tk-framework-header --with-tcltk-framework --without-tcltk-framework --enable-tcltk-framework --disable-tcltk-framework --enable-mac-tcltk-framework --disable-mac-tcltk-framework --with-tk-dir --without-tk-dir --with-tk-include --without-tk-include=${tk-dir}/include --with-tk-lib --without-tk-lib=${tk-dir}/lib --with-tcl-dir --without-tcl-dir --with-tcl-include --without-tcl-include=${tcl-dir}/include --with-tcl-lib --without-tcl-lib=${tcl-dir}/lib --with-X11-dir --without-X11-dir --with-X11-include --without-X11-include=${X11-dir}/include --with-X11-lib --without-X11-lib=${X11-dir}/lib --with-tk-lib --without-tk-lib --with-tcl-lib --without-tcl-lib --with-X11-lib --without-X11-lib --with-tklib --without-tklib --with-tcllib --without-tcllib --enable-tcltk_stubs --disable-tcltk_stubs --with-tcltk_stubs --without-tcltk_stubs --with-tcltkversion --without-tcltkversion --with-X11 --without-X11 --with-tcl8.4lib --without-tcl8.4lib --with-tcl84lib --without-tcl84lib --with-tcl8.4glib --without-tcl8.4glib --with-tcl84glib --without-tcl84glib --with-tcl8.4lib --without-tcl8.4lib --with-tcl84lib --without-tcl84lib --with-tcl8.4glib --without-tcl8.4glib --with-tcl84glib --without-tcl84glib --with-tcl8.7lib --without-tcl8.7lib --with-tcl87lib --without-tcl87lib --with-tcl8.7glib --without-tcl8.7glib --with-tcl87glib --without-tcl87glib --with-tcl8.7lib --without-tcl8.7lib --with-tcl87lib --without-tcl87lib --with-tcl8.7glib --without-tcl8.7glib --with-tcl87glib --without-tcl87glib --with-tcl8.6lib --without-tcl8.6lib --with-tcl86lib --without-tcl86lib --with-tcl8.6glib --without-tcl8.6glib --with-tcl86glib --without-tcl86glib --with-tcl8.6lib --without-tcl8.6lib --with-tcl86lib --without-tcl86lib --with-tcl8.6glib --without-tcl8.6glib --with-tcl86glib --without-tcl86glib --with-tcl8.5lib --without-tcl8.5lib --with-tcl85lib --without-tcl85lib extconf.rb:154:in `require': no such file to load -- display (LoadError) from extconf.rb:154:in `find_tcl' from extconf.rb:407:in `<main>'
on 2010-01-19 20:46
> --without-tcl85lib > extconf.rb:154:in `require': no such file to load -- display (LoadError) > from extconf.rb:154:in `find_tcl' oops left a line of debug code in there. or install the 'display' gem :) you also "might" need Tcl 8.4--give 'era shot, though, with 8.5... -rp
on 2010-01-19 21:00
Roger Pack wrote: > you also "might" need Tcl 8.4--give 'era shot, though, with 8.5... > gem install tk_as_gem --platform x86-mingw32 Building native extensions. This could take a while... Successfully installed tk_as_gem-0.0.1 1 gem installed Installing ri documentation for tk_as_gem-0.0.1... Updating class cache with 1669 classes... Installing RDoc documentation for tk_as_gem-0.0.1... C:\Users\Joel>irb irb(main):001:0> require "tk" => true Works fine Roger - many thanks. I'm going to bypass Titanium and play with TK instead because Titanium is missing a lot of documentation.
on 2010-01-19 21:06
Alpha Blue wrote: > Roger Pack wrote: >> you also "might" need Tcl 8.4--give 'era shot, though, with 8.5... >> > gem install tk_as_gem --platform x86-mingw32 > Building native extensions. This could take a while... > Successfully installed tk_as_gem-0.0.1 > 1 gem installed > Installing ri documentation for tk_as_gem-0.0.1... > Updating class cache with 1669 classes... > Installing RDoc documentation for tk_as_gem-0.0.1... > > C:\Users\Joel>irb > irb(main):001:0> require "tk" > => true > > Works fine Roger - many thanks. I'm going to bypass Titanium and play > with TK instead because Titanium is missing a lot of documentation. But apparently, Ruby/Tk has an awful API. The Ruby GUI survey at pressure.to found that developers rated Ruby/Tk dead last in quality of API, and recommended that it be removed from the standard library. You probably want to use something else. Best, --Â Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org marnen@marnen.org
on 2010-01-19 22:00
On Jan 19, 9:06 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <mar...@marnen.org> wrote: > > Installing RDoc documentation for tk_as_gem-0.0.1... > API, and recommended that it be removed from the standard library. You > probably want to use something else. > I could not agree more. After trying to make an application with Ruby/ Tk I've switched to WxRuby which works equally well under the Linux and Windows and Ruby 1.8.6 and 1.9.1. Regards, Bosko Ivanisevic
on 2010-01-19 22:37
> But apparently, Ruby/Tk has an awful API. The Ruby GUI survey at > pressure.to found that developers rated Ruby/Tk dead last in quality of > API, and recommended that it be removed from the standard library. You > probably want to use something else. > > Best, Thanks Marnen, The nice thing about having so many knowledgeable people here is that I get to browse and play with a lot of different GUI platforms. I've already started to play with TK and compared to some areas of development, I'm not having much trouble understanding the API. The first thing I'm doing is translating their TKDocs so that it only shows TK and Ruby and I've removed perl/python from their documentation. I've also cleaned up the experience and formatted the document into pdf which I emailed to my kindle for off-hours reading. There's also a full application at github for Arcadia which uses TK and I downloaded it and am browsing some of the files. The one thing that helps me with all of this is I used to create many GUI applications with numerous languages, namely C++, C#, VB, AutoIt, and Java. I already have my code formatted and ready to port. All I needed was something to port it over to. I wrote GoogleHack in AutoIt which is not an object oriented language. But, I wrote it using functions that were used very similar to classes. So, as I'm porting over the code to ruby, it's not all that difficult. As for the elements in TK, not finding it that difficult either. What can I say.. I'm a sponge.
on 2010-01-19 22:46
Bosko Ivanisevic wrote: > On Jan 19, 9:06�pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <mar...@marnen.org> wrote: >> > Installing RDoc documentation for tk_as_gem-0.0.1... >> API, and recommended that it be removed from the standard library. �You >> probably want to use something else. >> > I could not agree more. After trying to make an application with Ruby/ > Tk I've switched to WxRuby which works equally well under the Linux > and Windows and Ruby 1.8.6 and 1.9.1. > > Regards, > Bosko Ivanisevic I'll look into that as well.
on 2010-01-19 23:04
I liked the look of wxruby as well so I went ahead and installed the gem. After trying an irb -> require test i receive: C:\Users\Joel>irb irb(main):001:0> require "wx" C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mingw32/lib/wxruby2.so: [BUG ] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.1p243 (2009-07-16 revision 24175) [i386-mingw32] -- control frame ---------- c:0028 p:-12564990 s:0097 b:0097 l:000096 d:000096 TOP c:0027 p:---- s:0095 b:0095 l:000094 d:000094 CFUNC :require c:0026 p:0011 s:0091 b:0091 l:000090 d:000090 TOP C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/gems/1.9 .1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mingw32/lib/wx.rb:12 c:0025 p:---- s:0088 b:0088 l:000087 d:000087 FINISH c:0024 p:---- s:0086 b:0086 l:000085 d:000085 CFUNC :require c:0023 p:0011 s:0082 b:0082 l:001944 d:001bcc EVAL (irb):1 c:0022 p:---- s:0080 b:0080 l:000079 d:000079 FINISH c:0021 p:---- s:0078 b:0078 l:000077 d:000077 CFUNC :eval c:0020 p:0027 s:0071 b:0071 l:000070 d:000070 METHOD C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b/workspace.rb:80 c:0019 p:0031 s:0064 b:0063 l:000062 d:000062 METHOD C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b/context.rb:218 c:0018 p:0030 s:0058 b:0058 l:001a7c d:000057 BLOCK C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b.rb:149 c:0017 p:0037 s:0050 b:0050 l:000049 d:000049 METHOD C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b.rb:263 c:0016 p:0011 s:0045 b:0045 l:001a7c d:000044 BLOCK C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b.rb:146 c:0015 p:0132 s:0041 b:0041 l:000024 d:000040 BLOCK C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b/ruby-lex.rb:244 c:0014 p:---- s:0038 b:0038 l:000037 d:000037 FINISH c:0013 p:---- s:0036 b:0036 l:000035 d:000035 CFUNC :loop c:0012 p:0009 s:0033 b:0033 l:000024 d:000032 BLOCK C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b/ruby-lex.rb:230 c:0011 p:---- s:0031 b:0031 l:000030 d:000030 FINISH c:0010 p:---- s:0029 b:0029 l:000028 d:000028 CFUNC :catch c:0009 p:0023 s:0025 b:0025 l:000024 d:000024 METHOD C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b/ruby-lex.rb:229 c:0008 p:0042 s:0022 b:0022 l:001a7c d:001a7c METHOD C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b.rb:145 c:0007 p:0011 s:0019 b:0019 l:00113c d:000018 BLOCK C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b.rb:69 c:0006 p:---- s:0017 b:0017 l:000016 d:000016 FINISH c:0005 p:---- s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 CFUNC :catch c:0004 p:0172 s:0011 b:0011 l:00113c d:00113c METHOD C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/ir b.rb:68 c:0003 p:0039 s:0006 b:0006 l:002334 d:00264c EVAL C:/Ruby19/bin/irb:12 c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:002334 d:002334 TOP --------------------------- -- Ruby level backtrace information----------------------------------------- C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mingw32/lib/wx.rb:12:in `req uire' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mingw32/lib/wx.rb:12:in `<to p (required)>' (irb):1:in `require' (irb):1:in `irb_binding' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/workspace.rb:80:in `eval' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/workspace.rb:80:in `evaluate' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/context.rb:218:in `evaluate' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:149:in `block (2 levels) in eval_input' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:263:in `signal_status' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:146:in `block in eval_input' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:244:in `block (2 levels) in each_top_le vel_statement' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in `loop' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in `block in each_top_level_stateme nt' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in `catch' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in `each_top_level_statement' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:145:in `eval_input' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:69:in `block in start' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:68:in `catch' C:/Ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:68:in `start' C:/Ruby19/bin/irb:12:in `<main>' [NOTE] You may encounter a bug of Ruby interpreter. Bug reports are welcome. For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information.
on 2010-01-19 23:17
1.9.1 installer for patch 243 with wxruby works fine. I'm using that so no help needed.
Enable email notification
Enable multi-page viewPlease log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.