Forum: Ruby-core [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2's schedule canceled

At RubyWorld conf, I talked with matz, ko1, Evan Phoenix, Charles
Nutter and Thomas Enebo.
Then I understood importance of RubySpec. Now I agree Run Paint Run
Run's suggestion - [ruby-core:24050].
Ruby 1.9.2 must pass before release. I believe this makes it clear,
what Ruby 1.9 is. And this brings us more compatibility between
implementations.

But this decision takes little more time. So I cancel Ruby 1.9.2's
release schedule. A Ruby developer's meeting will be held soon. I'll
decide a new schedule at the meeting.

Thanks.
-- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)

Excerpts from Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)'s message of Tue Sep 22 13:36:40 +0300 
2009:
> Then I understood importance of RubySpec. Now I agree Run Paint Run
> Run's suggestion - [ruby-core:24050].
> Ruby 1.9.2 must pass before release.
> 
> But this decision takes little more time. So I cancel Ruby 1.9.2's
> release schedule.

Excellent, thanks for the info.

> At RubyWorld conf, I talked with matz, ko1, Evan Phoenix, Charles
> Nutter and Thomas Enebo.
> Then I understood importance of RubySpec. Now I agree Run Paint Run
> Run's suggestion - [ruby-core:24050].
> Ruby 1.9.2 must pass before release. I believe this makes it clear,
> what Ruby 1.9 is. And this brings us more compatibility between
> implementations.

Wow. Thank you, everybody. Please let us know if we can help this 
process. :-)

>  Ruby 1.9.2 must pass [RubySpec] before release.

What is the plan to achieve this? Is it intended that *all* of
RubySpec should pass, or just the 'core' and 'language' specs? The
latter is the most feasible.