Feature #2022: Patch for ruby-1.8.6 and openssl-1.0 http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022 Author: Jeroen van Meeuwen Status: Open, Priority: Normal Attached is a patch for ruby-1.8.6 to enable it to compile with and use openssl-1.0
on 2009-08-31 01:34
on 2009-08-31 01:56
Issue #2022 has been updated by Kirk Haines. Assigned to set to Kirk Haines Thanks. I will take a look at it very soon. ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2009-08-31 04:43
Hi, At Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:32:19 +0900, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote in [ruby-core:25210]: > Attached is a patch for ruby-1.8.6 to enable it to compile > with and use openssl-1.0 Other versions have no problem? And it can compile with earlier openssl?
on 2009-09-01 08:47
Hi, At Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:32:19 +0900, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote in [ruby-core:25210]: > Attached is a patch for ruby-1.8.6 to enable it to compile > with and use openssl-1.0 It could compile with openssl 0.9.8k, though one hunk was rejected in trunk. This patch is against the trunk and can be applied to 1.9.1, 1.8 and 1.8.7. * ext/openssl/ossl.c (OSSL_IMPL_SK2ARY): for OpenSSL 1.0. based on a patch from Jeroen van Meeuwen at [ruby-core:25210] * ext/openssl/ossl_ssl.c (ossl_ssl_method_tab), (ossl_ssl_cipher_to_ary): constified. * ext/openssl/ossl_pkcs7.c (pkcs7_get_certs, pkcs7_get_crls): split pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls. Index: ext/openssl/ossl.c =================================================================== --- ext/openssl/ossl.c (revision 24721) +++ ext/openssl/ossl.c (working copy) @@ -93,5 +93,5 @@ ossl_x509_ary2sk(VALUE ary) #define OSSL_IMPL_SK2ARY(name, type) \ VALUE \ -ossl_##name##_sk2ary(STACK *sk) \ +ossl_##name##_sk2ary(STACK_OF(type) *sk) \ { \ type *t; \ @@ -103,5 +103,5 @@ ossl_##name##_sk2ary(STACK *sk) \ return Qnil; \ } \ - num = sk_num(sk); \ + num = sk_##type##_num(sk); \ if (num < 0) { \ OSSL_Debug("items in sk < -1???"); \ @@ -111,5 +111,5 @@ ossl_##name##_sk2ary(STACK *sk) \ \ for (i=0; i<num; i++) { \ - t = (type *)sk_value(sk, i); \ + t = sk_##type##_value(sk, i); \ rb_ary_push(ary, ossl_##name##_new(t)); \ } \ Index: ext/openssl/ossl_pkcs7.c =================================================================== --- ext/openssl/ossl_pkcs7.c (revision 24721) +++ ext/openssl/ossl_pkcs7.c (working copy) @@ -573,10 +573,9 @@ ossl_pkcs7_add_certificate(VALUE self, V } -static STACK * -pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls(VALUE self, int want_certs) +static STACK_OF(X509) * +pkcs7_get_certs(VALUE self) { PKCS7 *pkcs7; STACK_OF(X509) *certs; - STACK_OF(X509_CRL) *crls; int i; @@ -586,15 +585,36 @@ pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls(VALUE self, int case NID_pkcs7_signed: certs = pkcs7->d.sign->cert; - crls = pkcs7->d.sign->crl; break; case NID_pkcs7_signedAndEnveloped: certs = pkcs7->d.signed_and_enveloped->cert; + break; + default: + certs = NULL; + } + + return certs; +} + +static STACK_OF(X509_CRL) * +pkcs7_get_crls(VALUE self) +{ + PKCS7 *pkcs7; + STACK_OF(X509_CRL) *crls; + int i; + + GetPKCS7(self, pkcs7); + i = OBJ_obj2nid(pkcs7->type); + switch(i){ + case NID_pkcs7_signed: + crls = pkcs7->d.sign->crl; + break; + case NID_pkcs7_signedAndEnveloped: crls = pkcs7->d.signed_and_enveloped->crl; break; default: - certs = crls = NULL; + crls = NULL; } - return want_certs ? certs : crls; + return crls; } @@ -611,5 +631,5 @@ ossl_pkcs7_set_certificates(VALUE self, X509 *cert; - certs = pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls(self, 1); + certs = pkcs7_get_certs(self); while((cert = sk_X509_pop(certs))) X509_free(cert); rb_block_call(ary, rb_intern("each"), 0, 0, ossl_pkcs7_set_certs_i, self); @@ -621,5 +641,5 @@ static VALUE ossl_pkcs7_get_certificates(VALUE self) { - return ossl_x509_sk2ary(pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls(self, 1)); + return ossl_x509_sk2ary(pkcs7_get_certs(self)); } @@ -651,5 +671,5 @@ ossl_pkcs7_set_crls(VALUE self, VALUE ar X509_CRL *crl; - crls = pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls(self, 0); + crls = pkcs7_get_crls(self); while((crl = sk_X509_CRL_pop(crls))) X509_CRL_free(crl); rb_block_call(ary, rb_intern("each"), 0, 0, ossl_pkcs7_set_crls_i, self); @@ -661,5 +681,5 @@ static VALUE ossl_pkcs7_get_crls(VALUE self) { - return ossl_x509crl_sk2ary(pkcs7_get_certs_or_crls(self, 0)); + return ossl_x509crl_sk2ary(pkcs7_get_crls(self)); } Index: ext/openssl/ossl_ssl.c =================================================================== --- ext/openssl/ossl_ssl.c (revision 24721) +++ ext/openssl/ossl_ssl.c (working copy) @@ -97,4 +97,10 @@ static const char *ossl_ssl_attrs[] = { ID ID_callback_state; +#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10000000L +#define OSSL_MORE_CONST const +#define STACK _STACK +#else +#define OSSL_MORE_CONST +#endif /* * SSLContext class @@ -102,5 +108,5 @@ ID ID_callback_state; struct { const char *name; - SSL_METHOD *(*func)(void); + OSSL_MORE_CONST SSL_METHOD *(*func)(void); } ossl_ssl_method_tab[] = { #define OSSL_SSL_METHOD_ENTRY(name) { #name, name##_method } @@ -151,5 +157,5 @@ static VALUE ossl_sslctx_set_ssl_version(VALUE self, VALUE ssl_method) { - SSL_METHOD *method = NULL; + OSSL_MORE_CONST SSL_METHOD *method = NULL; const char *s; int i; @@ -663,5 +669,5 @@ ossl_sslctx_setup(VALUE self) static VALUE -ossl_ssl_cipher_to_ary(SSL_CIPHER *cipher) +ossl_ssl_cipher_to_ary(OSSL_MORE_CONST SSL_CIPHER *cipher) { VALUE ary; @@ -1419,5 +1425,5 @@ ossl_ssl_get_cipher(VALUE self) { SSL *ssl; - SSL_CIPHER *cipher; + OSSL_MORE_CONST SSL_CIPHER *cipher; Data_Get_Struct(self, SSL, ssl);
on 2009-09-29 16:37
Issue #2022 has been updated by Nikolai Lugovoi.
Though patch applies well for compilation, it results in some random
segfaults with openssl-1.0beta3, from test/openssl/test_ssl.rb, when
SSLContext is garbage collected before referencing SSLSocket - in all
ruby versions - 1.8.6, 1.8.7 and 1.9.2dev
As workaround, I tried to check references count in ossl_ssl.c:
static void
ossl_sslctx_free(SSL_CTX *ctx)
{
+ if(ctx && ctx->references > 1) return;
if(ctx && SSL_CTX_get_ex_data(ctx, ossl_ssl_ex_store_p)== (void*)1)
ctx->cert_store = NULL;
SSL_CTX_free(ctx)
that seemed to eliminate segfaults, but not sure if it does not
introduce memory leaks.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2009-11-26 02:52
Issue #2022 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. Status changed from Open to Assigned What's current status? Fedora 12 uses openssl 1.0 Beta 3; So Fedora people can't build ruby now. ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2010-01-05 11:06
Issue #2022 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
File 0001-Apply-Jeroen-van-Meeuwen-s-and-Nobu-Nakada-s-OpenSSL.patch
added
File 0002-Fix-some-various-OpenSSL-compilation-and-runtime-war.patch
added
File 0003-Fix-some-OpenSSL-extension-unit-tests-for-OpenSSL-1..patch
added
I verify that Nobuyoshi Nakada's and Jeroen van Meeuwen's patch works on
both OpenSSL 0.9 and 1.0. I've tested on the following systems:
- OS X Snow Leopard
All Ruby OpenSSL tests pass, and all RubySpec OpenSSL tests pass.
- Fedora 12, x86_64
There are some compilation warnings. All RubySpec OpenSSL tests pass,
but some Ruby OpenSSL tests fail. It seems that OpenSSL changed somewhat
in behavior; for example some #verify methods now raise an error instead
of returning false.
The attached patches fixes some compilation warnings and fixes some
unit tests.
Following tests still fail on Fedora 12:
1) Failure:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509Certificate)
[./openssl/test_x509cert.rb:168]:
<OpenSSL::X509::CertificateError> exception expected but none was
thrown.
2) Failure:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509Request)
[./openssl/test_x509req.rb:133]:
<OpenSSL::X509::RequestError> exception expected but none was thrown.
I am not able to reproduce Nikolai Lugovoi's segfaults. According to the
man page for ssl_cx_free (http://linux.die.net/man/3/ssl_ctx_free) that
function only frees the context if the reference count drops to 0. There
should be no need to check ctx->references.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2010-01-05 11:06
Issue #2022 has been updated by Hongli Lai. Those patches are against 1.8.7-p248. ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2010-01-08 10:36
Hi, At Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:05:54 +0900, Hongli Lai wrote in [ruby-core:27417]: > There are some compilation warnings. All RubySpec OpenSSL > tests pass, but some Ruby OpenSSL tests fail. It seems that > OpenSSL changed somewhat in behavior; for example some > #verify methods now raise an error instead of returning > false. > The attached patches fixes some compilation warnings and > fixes some unit tests. - rconf = rb_iv_get(self, "@config"); + i_config = rb_intern("@config"); + if (rb_ivar_defined(self, i_config)) + rconf = rb_ivar_get(self, i_config); + else + rconf = Qnil; conf = NIL_P(rconf) ? NULL : GetConfigPtr(rconf); ext = X509V3_EXT_nconf_nid(conf, ctx, nid, RSTRING_PTR(valstr)); #else rb_attr_get() doesn't yield "not initialized" warning.
on 2010-02-05 15:01
Issue #2022 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
File openssl-build-fix-v2.patch added
File 0002-openssl-verify-don-t-assume-false.patch added
File 0003-test-openssl-drop-the-test-of-assuming-too-cool-guess.patch
added
This issue still occur.
Now, Trunk + Fedora12 on x86_64 makes following error.
Then, I did forwardport Lai's patch to current trunk.
openssl-build-fix-v2.patch mean
0001-Apply-Jeroen-van-Meeuwen-s-and-Nobu-Nakada-s-OpenSSL.patch
+ 0002-Fix-some-various-OpenSSL-compilation-and-runtime-war.patch
- ugly OSSL_MORE_CONST macro
- unnecessary hunk of comment#12
This patch fixes the build error.
0002-openssl-verify-don-t-assume-false.patch mean
simply forward port of
0003-Fix-some-OpenSSL-extension-unit-tests-for-OpenSSL-1..patch
This patch fixes following false positive test failure.
4) Error:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509CRL):
OpenSSL::X509::CRLError: wrong public key type
/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509crl.rb:200:in `verify'
/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509crl.rb:200:in
`test_sign_and_verify'
5) Error:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509Certificate):
OpenSSL::X509::CertificateError: wrong public key type
/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509cert.rb:137:in
`verify'
/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509cert.rb:137:in
`test_sign_and_verify'
6) Error:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509Request):
OpenSSL::X509::RequestError: wrong public key type
/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509req.rb:110:in `verify'
/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509req.rb:110:in
`test_sign_and_verify'
0003-test-openssl-drop-the-test-of-assuming-too-cool-guess.patch is new
patch. It remove two following false positive warnings.
4) Failure:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509Certificate)
[/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509cert.rb:169]:
OpenSSL::X509::CertificateError expected but nothing was raised.
5) Failure:
test_sign_and_verify(OpenSSL::TestX509Request)
[/home/kosaki/linux/ruby/test/openssl/test_x509req.rb:133]:
OpenSSL::X509::RequestError expected but nothing was raised.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2010-02-08 20:04
Issue #2022 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. Category set to ext Target version set to 1.9.2 KOSAKI's patch looks good. We may be able to commit fixes for tests. ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2010-02-28 03:59
Issue #2022 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. Status changed from Assigned to Closed % Done changed from 0 to 100 This issue was solved with changeset r26781. Jeroen, thank you for reporting this issue. Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated. May Ruby be with you. ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
on 2010-03-05 15:41
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 04:03, Yui NARUSE <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > Issue #2022 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. > > Category set to ext > Target version set to 1.9.2 > > KOSAKI's patch looks good. > We may be able to commit fixes for tests. Here's a topic branch for ruby_1_8(1.8.8dev). http://github.com/nahi/ruby/tree/openssl_19_bump Guys, would you please try the branch and let me know how it works for your env? It should support 1.0.0b5, 0.9.8m and earlier versions. I'll cleanup commits and merge it to ruby_1_8 in a few days. Trunk should follow it. Regards, // NaHi
on 2010-03-06 23:19
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 23:40, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll cleanup commits and merge it to ruby_1_8 in a few days. Trunk > should follow it. Merged to ruby_1_8. Following commits should be applied to the trunk. http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/repositories/revision/ruby-18?rev=26837 http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/repositories/revision/ruby-18?rev=26839 http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/repositories/revision/ruby-18?rev=26840 Regards, // NaHi
on 2010-06-03 14:37
Issue #2022 has been updated by semen shchukin. Can somebody say me how to use this patch?)) what commands in the terminal should I write to get workable files? Thank you ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2022
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.