This is a little silly, but shouldn't poor old nginx.net be upgraded from nginx 0.6.31 to the current stable production release? ;-)
on 2009-06-05 03:30
on 2009-06-05 03:55
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Mark M.<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > This is a little silly, but shouldn't poor old nginx.net be upgraded from > nginx 0.6.31 to the current stable production release? ;-) > It is? The development stable versions are nginx-0.8.0, nginx/Windows-0.8.0, the change log. The latest stable versions are nginx-0.7.59, nginx/Windows-0.7.59, the change log. The latest legacy stable version is nginx-0.6.37, the change log.
on 2009-06-05 04:08
He's saying the actual website's server software that is serving the information about Nginx should be updated to the latest version of Nginx. -- Kevin W.
on 2009-06-05 04:41
I think Mark meant the nginx that runs nginx.net: $ curl -sI http://nginx.net | grep Server Server: nginx/0.6.31
on 2009-06-05 05:11
Thanks Eden and Kevin, that's what I meant.
on 2009-06-06 02:08
Support upgrade. :-) Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,2636,2642#msg-2642
on 2009-06-06 03:12
I think that's is the minus important in a web site that handle static content in mas parts of the website. I know people using 0.5 version of nginx yet.! Regards.
on 2009-06-06 03:56
Right. "If It Works, Don't Fix It!" BR, Zsolt