hi,
i would like to do something like the following
if true
do_a
else
d_a
d_b
end
Can this be done using ternary operator?
This seem to give different result:
ifTrue ? do_a : do_a and do_b
Thank you.
hi,
i would like to do something like the following
if true
do_a
else
d_a
d_b
end
Can this be done using ternary operator?
This seem to give different result:
ifTrue ? do_a : do_a and do_b
Thank you.
Parv G. wrote:
Can this be done using ternary operator?
This seem to give different result:
ifTrue ? do_a : do_a and do_bThank you.
result = false ? nil : (x=1; x+=10; x)
p result # ==> 11
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Parv G. [email protected] wrote:
Can this be done using ternary operator?
This seem to give different result:
ifTrue ? do_a : do_a and do_b
If the goal is to always run the truthy condition and optionally some
extra code for the falsey one, this will work as well:
do_a ; do_b if ifTrue
Parv G. wrote:
hi,
i would like to do something like the following
if true
do_a
else
d_a
d_b
endCan this be done using ternary operator?
This seem to give different result:
ifTrue ? do_a : do_a and do_b
‘and’ is very low precendence operator, and also will only do_b if the
result of do_a is true.
ifTrue ? do_a : (do_a, do_b)
Hi,
At Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:54:48 +0900,
Brian C. wrote in [ruby-talk:338415]:
ifTrue ? do_a : (do_a, do_b)
You need a semicolon instead of a comma.
Nobuyoshi N. wrote:
Brian C. wrote in [ruby-talk:338415]:
ifTrue ? do_a : (do_a, do_b)
You need a semicolon instead of a comma.
Sorry, that’s me with my C head on
On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Parv G. wrote:
Can this be done using ternary operator?
This seem to give different result:
ifTrue ? do_a : do_a and do_b
since you always “do_a”, why no execute it always?
do_a
do_b if true
regards,
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs