Folks, I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top posting ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style). If you have a [Cucumber] topic, please respond with inline comments. And use plain text email - not html. Thanks, Aslak
on 06.05.2009 21:04
on 06.05.2009 21:32
On 07/05/2009, at 4:54 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote: > Folks, > > I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top posting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > ). > If you have a [Cucumber] topic, please respond with inline comments. > And use plain text email - not html. > I find it quite hard to follow conversations that use bottom posting, so I'll try to do interleaved comments from now on. It's almost impossible to do interleave posting on the iphone, btw. Thanks. Julian. ---------------------------------------------- Blog: http://random8.zenunit.com/ Learn: http://sensei.zenunit.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/random8r
on 07.05.2009 01:45
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
on 07.05.2009 02:37
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ben Mabey <ben@benmabey.com> wrote: > Aslak So let me get this right, you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. by top posting???? -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
on 07.05.2009 02:55
Rick DeNatale wrote: >> > lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come across well over email I suppose. -Ben
on 07.05.2009 03:02
Just so you know, _your_ message isn't just plain text. Here's a portion of the raw message: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style). >Folks,<br><br>I find it really hard to follow conversations that use top po= >sting (<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style">http://en.wik= >ipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style</a>).<br>If you have a [Cucumber] topic, plea= >se respond with inline comments. And use plain text email - not html.<br> ><br>Thanks,<br>Aslak<br> > >--001636c5b0eedf7860046942ecfc-- >--===============0527642389== -Steve
on 07.05.2009 03:18
How about both top and bottom posting? Francis Hwang http://fhwang.net/ On May 6, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Ben Mabey wrote: > lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come across well over > email I suppose. How about both top and bottom posting? Francis Hwang http://fhwang.net/
on 07.05.2009 03:27
On May 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote: >> Thanks, >> Aslak > > So let me get this right, > > you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. > > by top posting???? And Aslak's post was multipart/mime!? Was that just for the irony? You guys are funny... :-) Andrew Vit
on 07.05.2009 03:41
Nick: How about On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Francis Hwang <
on 07.05.2009 21:30
>> So let me get this right, >> >> you agreed with Aslak that you shouldn't top post. >> >> by top posting???? >> > lol.. Yes. :) Sarcasm somethings doesn't come across well over email > I suppose. Not only that, he did it in <html> so it was impossible for me to see whether it was top or bottom. The sarcasm was clear enough, tho ;) +1 from me, too. I'm adding a request: cut out the paragraphs of the email that you are not responding to. I'm encountering plenty of emails that don't fit on my screen (which is much bigger than an iPhone) and turn out to contain not much more than "yes", "thanks" or "see lighthouse <url>". Bye, Kero. ___ How can I change the world if I can't even change myself? -- Faithless, Salva Mea
on 09.05.2009 00:38
On 7 mei 2009, at 19:12, Kero van Gelder wrote: > Not only that, he did it in <html> so it was impossible for > me to see whether it was top or bottom. The sarcasm was clear > enough, tho ;) > > +1 from me, too. > > I'm adding a request: cut out the paragraphs of the email > that you are not responding to. Same goes for signatures, if you'd ask me. gr, bartz