Forum: Ruby on Rails validators.rb breaks on update from Rails 2.2.2 to 2.3.2

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
John Mackin (Guest)
on 2009-04-25 13:52
(Received via mailing list)
Hi,

I just upgrade from 2.2.2 to 2.3.2 and the following error when trying
to start the server

=> Booting Mongrel
=> Rails 2.3.2 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/
active_support/core_ext/module/aliasing.rb:33:in `alias_method':
undefined method `valid?' for class `ActiveRecord::Base' (NameError)
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/
active_support/core_ext/module/aliasing.rb:33:in `alias_method_chain'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/callbacks.rb:224:in `send'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/callbacks.rb:224:in `included'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/callbacks.rb:223:in `each'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/callbacks.rb:223:in `included'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/base.rb:3143:in `include'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/base.rb:3143
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/
active_record/base.rb:3137:in `class_eval'
   ... 11 levels...
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.2/lib/commands/
server.rb:84
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:
31:in `gem_original_require'
  from /opt/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:
31:in `require'
  from ./script/server:3

I figured out that by commenting out the validators.rb (http://
pastie.org/457289) that I used so far it'll start up fine.

Apparently the issue lies with valid? but I can't figure out how to
fix it.

Does anyone know how to go about this?

Cheers,

JM
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.