Hi all I'm a bit confused whether it's better to check for the ID of a related object or the related object itself? validates_presence_of :user # is this better? validates_presence_of :user_id # or is this better? What would you suggest? Thanks, Josh
on 2009-04-16 15:09
on 2009-04-16 15:24
validates_presence_of :user_id will test if there is a value for self.user_id regardless of whether there is a valid user with that id on the database. If you're going to use :user_id then you should include validates_associated :user to check the user is valid validates_presence_of :user will check that the associated user is a valid record. On Apr 16, 2:09 pm, Joshua Muheim <rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net>
on 2009-04-16 15:28
Thanks for your explanation. :-) > validates_presence_of :user will check that the associated user is a > valid record. so if the user id is nil, then there is no error?
on 2009-04-16 15:35
validates_presence_of :user_id only tests that there is a value for user_id with this method, user_id could be any integer, not necessarily a valid user. validates_presence_of :user will also check that the user is a valid record on the database. That clear it up?
on 2009-04-16 17:08
Gavin wrote: > validates_presence_of :user_id only tests that there is a value for > user_id > > > with this method, user_id could be any integer, not necessarily a > valid user. > > validates_presence_of :user will also check that the user is a valid > record on the database. > > That clear it up? so validates_presence_of :user does the same like the combination of validates_presence_of :user_id and validates_associated :user... right? thanks for the explanation. :-)
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.