Forum: Ruby on Rails OOP road block

Announcement (2017-05-07): is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see and for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Fernando P. (Guest)
on 2009-04-01 12:21

I recently performed a major rewrite of my app to provide better
encapsulation and more descriptive behavior for my models.

But I also encountered very often a dilemma: does the logic I am writing
belong to the class, or does it belong to an instance?

I am running an ecommerce website, so I have the following models:

User(id, name, ...)
Order(id, user_id, status, amount)
Item(id, order_id, product_id, quantity)
Product(id, price, title, ...)

Now I'd like to know if a given User has purchased a given Product.

So I fetch my user and product objects
user = User.find_by_name('Fernando')
product = Product.find_by_title('The book of Awesome')

Then, here is my problem. How would you search if the book was purchased
by the user? There are few ways of doing it:

* User#find_if_user_purchased_product?(product_id)
And then the search makes a join with Item and Order, but it introduces
the state of the Order in the condition, it could be 'paid', 'unpaid'.
And here is my problem: I recently migrated from an integer state (i.e:
paid = 0, unpaid = 5) to strings. And that logic is in the User model,
but a User shouldn't be aware about how Order handles its payment

Therefore this might mean that I should create a class method:
Order.find_paid_order_for_product_by_user(product_id, user_id)

This only has to know about the product_id and the user_id. Now this
means that my User#find_if_user_purchased_product(product_id) code
becomes something like:

def find_if_user_purchased_product?(product_id)

Doesn't it seem stupid that 1 method under hood, simply calls another
method? Don't I have a problem of how I am searching if my user has
purchased this product?

How would you handle such problem? It's not only related to my ecommerce
shop, it could be anything where a DB search is made across 3 tables of
Fernando P. (Guest)
on 2009-04-01 13:05
I think the problem lies in the ability for the DB to perform a join
across multiple tables which in fact breaks encapsulation!

Maybe I should break down my DB query that uses joins into smaller
queries. The code is obviously less efficient, but it's more
maintainable, as each model is only concerned with its own stuff, and
therefore I don't have to make edits across various models just because
I changed the name or type of attributes in a single model.

Using joins across multiple models doesn't feel right anymore.
Harold (Guest)
on 2009-04-01 16:29
(Received via mailing list)
I think this is a common 'dilemma' that comes across every now and
then. "Which model should I ask for this information"? I also think
there's no right answer. But here's my two cents:

In your case, you want to know which a product was purchased by a
user, so the question could go both ways: Did a user purchase this
product, or was this product purchased by the user. I think it depends
on your views and controllers, in other words, what is the main object
you find out the relationship about? If you're on a user view and want
to list purchased products, you might just ask @user.orders.each { |o|
o.products }.flatten (or some such thing). Similarly,
@product.orders.each { |o| o.user }.flatten would give you all users
who purchased that product. (this is all making some assumptions about
your relationships).

In either case, you are working with either an instance of User, or an
instance of Product, so I think that that this should not be a class
method, but an instance method.

Same goes when you're already dealing with a user instance and a
product instance and you want to find out if that relationship exists,
which is more to the point of your original post. How about an
instance method on the User class called has_purchased?:

@user.has_purchased?(@product) => true #or false

Here's a stab at that method...
#class User < AR:Base
def has_purchased?(product)

About joins, I think they are absolutely needed. Some models are more
"self contained" than others, but since you're working with a
relational model, it is natural that some models depend on others, and
using :joins or :include in your finders makes life easier in many

On Apr 1, 5:05 am, Fernando P. <removed_email_address@domain.invalid>
Julian L. (Guest)
on 2009-04-01 16:35
(Received via mailing list)
It also depends how optimal your SQL ends up.

Learn rails:
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.