I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?
On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Jeff S. [email protected] wrote:
I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?
I don’t believe it’s supposed to work on Ruby 1.9 yet.
On 4 Mar 2009, at 20:17, Jeff S. wrote:
I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple
things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered
these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?
2.3 is only an RC and ruby 1.9.1 is rather cutting edge so a few
issues are out there (hence why it’s an RC)
khiltd wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:17 pm, Jeff S. [email protected] wrote:
I’m using Rails 2.3 and Ruby 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5, and some simple things
are failing. I can’t believe I’m the only one who has encountered these
issues, so if anybody else is using the same tool versions, would you
please give a shout?I don’t believe it’s supposed to work on Ruby 1.9 yet.
Thanks; I guess I’m breaking new wind here.
Frederick C. wrote:
2.3 is only an RC and ruby 1.9.1 is rather cutting edge so a few
issues are out there (hence why it’s an RC)
Fair enough. I went with 2.3 because that’s what the Rails Guides
cover. I chose 1.9 because it’s supposedly a pretty major upgrade.
I’m willing to deal with a few issues; in fact, it would probably be a
great learning experience to find & fix a few bugs. At least this
explains why I’m not seeing reports of other people having the same
problems.