Ruby Forum Ruby > Ruby 1.9.1 is released

Posted by Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 17:42
(Received via mailing list)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, folks.

I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer
syntax, multilingualized and much improved version of Ruby. Ruby 1.8
series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.

Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

== Changes
You can read about major chanes since 1.8.7 at at
http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_9_1_0/NEWS .

We have fixed 7 bugs since 1.9.1 RC2.
 http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-19/issues?query_id=11

If you encounter any bugs or any problems, please let us know it via the
official issue tracking system (http://redmine.ruby-lang.org ).

== Location
* ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.bz2
  SIZE:   7190271 bytes
  MD5:    0278610ec3f895ece688de703d99143e
  SHA256: 
de7d33aeabdba123404c21230142299ac1de88c944c9f3215b816e824dd33321

* ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.gz
  SIZE:   9025004 bytes
  MD5:    50e4f381ce68c6de72bace6d75f0135b
  SHA256: 
a5485951823c8c22ddf6100fc9e10c7bfc85fb5a4483844033cee0fad9e292cc

* ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.zip
  SIZE:   10273609 bytes
  MD5:    3377d43b041877cda108e243c6b7f436
  SHA256: 
00562fce4108e5c6024c4152f943eaa7dcc8cf97d5c449ac102673a0d5c1943b


Thanks,
- -- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
=fAek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Posted by Pablo Q. (pabloq)
on 30.01.2009 18:16
(Received via mailing list)
Good news.

#ruby -e "p 'hello world'" -v
ruby 1.9.1 (2008-12-30 patchlevel-0 revision 21203) [i686-linux]
hello world

:D

2009/1/30 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>
Posted by James Gray (bbazzarrakk)
on 30.01.2009 18:23
(Received via mailing list)
On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:

> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Three cheers for the entire Ruby core team who has worked so hard to
bring us this release!  Please know that we appreciate your efforts.

James Edward Gray II

P.S.  Does this mean we beat Perl 6?  :D  (This is a joke folks.
Relax!)
Posted by Gregory Brown (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 18:31
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> 
wrote:

> P.S.  Does this mean we beat Perl 6?  :D  (This is a joke folks.  Relax!)

Nah, we'll need to wait for Ruby 2 for that :)

-greg
Posted by James Gray (bbazzarrakk)
on 30.01.2009 18:35
(Received via mailing list)
On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Gregory Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net 
> > wrote:
>
>> P.S.  Does this mean we beat Perl 6?  :D  (This is a joke folks.   
>> Relax!)
>
> Nah, we'll need to wait for Ruby 2 for that :)

We may still have time to get that out too.  ;)

James Edward Gray II
Posted by Andy Cooper (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 18:46
(Received via mailing list)
> 
> We may still have time to get that out too.  ;)
> 
> James Edward Gray II

I think that as long as the language changes faster than COBOL we are
doing good.

Andy Cooper.
Posted by Gregory Brown (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 18:47
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp> 
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on
release management, Yugui.

> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

Now that Ruby 1.9 is released, it seems there is no need for 1.8.7.

Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar
to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims?
This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.

-greg
Posted by James Herdman (biocsnerd)
on 30.01.2009 19:06
(Received via mailing list)
On Jan 30, 11:38 am, "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
> series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
> If you encounter any bugs or any problems, please let us know it via the
>   MD5:    50e4f381ce68c6de72bace6d75f0135b
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
> UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
> =fAek
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hooray! Congratulations Ruby team!
Posted by masayoshi takahashi (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 19:25
(Received via mailing list)
2009/1/31 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>:
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Congrats!!!


By the way, from www.ruby-lang.org:

| * Server maintenance
|
| Services of ruby-lang.org will be unavailable for the server maintenance
| between 01:00-06:00 on 31 Juanuary 2009 (UTC). Sorry for any inconvenience.

( 
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/28/20090131-server-maintenance/ 
)

You may not use the services of ruby-lang.org.

Just FYI.

Thanks,

Masayoshi Takahashi (takahashimm@gmail.com)
Posted by _why (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 19:26
(Received via mailing list)
Capital job, all of you. Nobu, Tanaka Akira, usa, yugui. And
especially koichi and matz. A big day for both of you. The new VM is
a lot of fun and you've worked so hard.

Also, many thanks to this list. I've often encountered Ruby 1.9
"bugs" and confusions, but it was all easily dismissed by finding
discussions about the internals which had already transpired here.

Yeah, so hearty backslaps and many rigorous unending handshakes
all around, this is great.

_why
Posted by Tim Hunter (timhunter)
on 30.01.2009 20:10
Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Con grat u lations to Matz, Koichi, Yugui, and everybody who worked so 
hard to
bring this off!

Pan Galactic Gargleblaster's all around!
Posted by Bob Martens (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 20:14
(Received via mailing list)
Congratulations to everyone involved. Fine work!
Posted by Jan Friedrich (janfri)
on 30.01.2009 20:44
(Received via mailing list)
Thanks a lot.

Now we can wait for Pickaxe 3. :)

Regards,
Jan Friedrich
Posted by Suraj Kurapati (snk)
on 30.01.2009 20:46
_why wrote:
> hearty backslaps and many rigorous unending handshakes all around

Well put, sir!  Indeed,

minna-san ni wa, domo arigato gozai-mashita!

  puts "banzai! " * 3  # :-)
Posted by Charles Oliver Nutter (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 20:47
(Received via mailing list)
Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi, folks.
> 
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Congratulations! Now that the stable release is out, we will pull 1.9.1
stdlib into JRuby. We'll ship our 1.9.1-compatible (mostly? hopefully?)
release of JRuby 1.2 in late February.

> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

Is 1.8.8 going to be based on 1.8.6 or 1.8.7? And is it planned to
change as many features as 1.8.7 did?

JRuby will remain at 1.8.6 compatibility (in 1.8 mode) until such time
that users let us know that they want support for 1.8.7+ features.

- Charlie
Posted by Zayd Abdullah (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 20:59
(Received via mailing list)
Congradulations guys!! I am a noob so this might be a silly question to 
the
majority, but can someone give me the steps to install 1.9 in my vista
environment? Need some help. I already saved the zip folder. Should I be
looking for an executable, becauseI cannot find it

Thanks

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <
Posted by Dave Thomas (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 21:08
(Received via mailing list)
On Jan 30, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Jan Friedrich wrote:

> Now we can wait for Pickaxe 3. :)

Final beta pushes early next week :)
Posted by Radosław Bułat (radarek)
on 30.01.2009 21:23
(Received via mailing list)
Congratulations and thanks for all your job to Matz, ko1 and the rest of 
us.
Tank you!
Posted by Robert Dober (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 21:33
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:20 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> 
wrote:
> P.S.  Does this mean we beat Perl 6?  :D  (This is a joke folks.  Relax!)
Wait 1 minute, I thought this *was* Perl 6, do not tell me I am in the
wrong community!!!!
R.
Posted by Hemant Kumar (gnufied)
on 30.01.2009 23:24
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp> 
wrote:
> series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
> Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.
>
> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

Awesome all the way!


PS: whats the status of RubySpec project w.r.t Ruby 1.9.1 ? Are specs
that fail are being corrected and stuff?
Posted by Michal Suchanek (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 23:38
(Received via mailing list)
On 30/01/2009, Zayd Abdullah <devrubygem@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congradulations guys!! I am a noob so this might be a silly question to the
>  majority, but can someone give me the steps to install 1.9 in my vista
>  environment? Need some help. I already saved the zip folder. Should I be
>  looking for an executable, becauseI cannot find it
>

I suggest you wait for the Windows One Click installer for 1.9/2.0.

Unless something has changed the Windows builds you can download at
garbagecollect are somewhat not completely finished. They are missing
parts, and not even documenting which ones. You could write a "hello
world" program using the build and perhaps explore some of the
features fof the new interpreter but you cannot even install gems.

I am not completely sure if anybody uses that stuff and what do they
use it for. It just shows Ruby *can* be built for WIndwows I guess.

Thanks

Michal
Posted by Zayd Abdullah (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 23:40
(Received via mailing list)
Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version? I'm 
having
trouble installing 1.9

Thanks
Posted by Zayd Abdullah (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 23:42
(Received via mailing list)
Hahahahaa Thanks Michal, you answered my question at the same time I was
typing it :)

Thanks
Posted by Bill Kelly (Guest)
on 30.01.2009 23:54
(Received via mailing list)
From: "James Gray" <james@grayproductions.net>
>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
> 
>> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
>> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.
> 
> Three cheers for the entire Ruby core team who has worked so hard to  
> bring us this release!  Please know that we appreciate your efforts.

+1        !!!


Very much appreciated indeed.


Thanks to all!

Bill
Posted by Michal Suchanek (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 00:23
(Received via mailing list)
On 30/01/2009, Zayd Abdullah <devrubygem@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version? I'm having
>  trouble installing 1.9
>

The problem is not with Ruby itself but with the libraries it uses
(zlib for gems, readline for irb, openssl for encryption and https
networking, sqlite, ...)

Most of these use unique build systems and have binaries built for
windows with different compilers.

To link this all together with Ruby is a recipe for disaster.

For that reason Luis is working on a new One Click installer which
builds all the libraries and ruby from source using the MinGW
compiler.

Unfortunately not all of the libraries build well in the MinGW
environment out of the box (or on Windows at all) so the project
requires lots of tedious work. There are only development and testing
releases of this installer. As far as I know no final release that
includes at least all the basic parts is available.

Thanks

Michal
Posted by Zayd Abdullah (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 00:37
(Received via mailing list)
Cool, thanks!!! I will be patiently waiting :)
Posted by Jayce Meade (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 00:39
(Received via mailing list)
Yeah, I'm having some problems installing too... I can do the compiling,
I'll figure it out, but I can't figure out how I get the tools needed to 
do
it, the win32 readme said I needed these:

    Note: building ruby requires following commands.
     * nmake
     * cl
     * lib
     * dumpbin

I have nmake, but how do I acquire the others? Google isn't helping me.

   - Jayce

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:20 PM
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 is released
Posted by Patrick Ro (sickboy)
on 31.01.2009 00:44
Thanks for this awesome release!

I was particularly interested in C-derrived languages due to my 
experience with a scripting and config language based on C.

However, after some days of Ruby, I quickly got the gripe of the 
dynamic, simple, yet powerful language and started to discover the 
wonders this higher level language has to offer.
Pulled some friends into it, and have been able to learn from more 
advanced programmers.

Since then i've been developing Ruby and Rails applications with a lot 
of fun;
anything is basically easy to do.

Anyway, enough fan-talk!
Got a MinGW build ready and roling; Don't know if it's acustomed to 
share, or self compile / wait for one click?
Posted by Roger Pack (rogerdpack)
on 31.01.2009 01:31
Zayd Abdullah wrote:
> Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version?

Luis plans on releasing a mingw 1.8.6 and a mingw 1.9, so yeah [he was 
waiting for the official release first].
Posted by Zayd Abdullah (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 01:50
(Received via mailing list)
Cool.. :)

Sent from my iPhone
Posted by Andrés Suárez (kaizen)
on 31.01.2009 10:53
If you are searching for win32 binaries of ruby1.9, this can help you:

http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/download/release.html


Thanks to all the Ruby's team development for their incredible job.

Regards,
Andrés
Posted by Jayce Meade (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 11:24
(Received via mailing list)
Fantastic! Thanks!

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Andrés Suárez" <ansuga@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:53 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
Posted by Emanuele Ricci (deliak)
on 31.01.2009 11:32
Ruby banzaaaaaaaaaai!
Posted by Jayce Meade (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 11:34
(Received via mailing list)
C:\Documents and Settings\User>gem install ftools
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `require': 126: The
specified
odule could not be found.   - 
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32/zlib.so
(Load
rror)
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `<top
(required)>

        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `require'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `<top
(required)>'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in 
`require'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `<top
(required
>'
        from 
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in
`requ
re'
        from 
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in
`<top
(required)>'
        from
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in `
equire'
        from
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in `
top (required)>'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in
`require

        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in
`rescue
n load_and_instantiate'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:132:in
`load_an
_instantiate'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:65:in 
`[]'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:118:in
`find_co
mand'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:104:in
`process
args'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:75:in 
`run'
        from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in `run'
        from c:/ruby/bin/gem.bat:32:in `<main>'

C:\Documents and Settings\User>

Got a few errors... figured it was due to uninstalled gems but the 
zlib.dll
thing is cropping up again. How do I fix this?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-rubytalk@live.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:23 AM
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
Posted by saravanan K (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 12:19
(Received via mailing list)
Ruby Rocks :)

2009/1/31 Emanuele Ricci <maurice.enciel@gmail.com>
Posted by Sean O'halpin (sean)
on 31.01.2009 13:40
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp> 
wrote:
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Wonderful news! Congratulations!

Sean
Posted by Luis Lavena (luislavena)
on 31.01.2009 14:10
(Received via mailing list)
On Jan 31, 8:34 am, Jayce Meade <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com> wrote:
>         from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `<top
> (required)>'
> `rescue
> args'
> From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com>
> > To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org>
> >> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>

You guys never read the instructions:

http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/documents/install.html

If you're installing garbage collect releases, you need to follow
these rules.

HTH,
Posted by Wu Junchen (phoenix520)
on 31.01.2009 15:38
How can I make it works in cygwin?
(gcc version 4.3.2 20080827 (alpha-testing) 1 (GCC))
There are some errors when I make it:

uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `opt_sc.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `opt_sc.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `optinsn.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `optinsn.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `optunifs.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `optunifs.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `insns.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `insns.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target 
`insns_info.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `insns_info.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `vmtc.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vmtc.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `vm.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vm.inc'
uncommon.mk:653: warning: overriding commands for target `node_name.inc'
Makefile:287: warning: ignoring old commands for target `node_name.inc'
uncommon.mk:668: warning: overriding commands for target 
`known_errors.inc'
Makefile:290: warning: ignoring old commands for target 
`known_errors.inc'
uncommon.mk:671: warning: overriding commands for target `miniprelude.c'
Makefile:293: warning: ignoring old commands for target `miniprelude.c'
uncommon.mk:680: warning: overriding commands for target `newline.c'
Makefile:296: warning: ignoring old commands for target `newline.c'
uncommon.mk:742: *** target file `up' has both : and :: entries.  Stop.
Posted by Wu Junchen (phoenix520)
on 31.01.2009 16:11
Wu Junchen wrote:
> How can I make it works in cygwin?
> (gcc version 4.3.2 20080827 (alpha-testing) 1 (GCC))
> There are some errors when I make it:
> 
After downloaded the package from the ftp instead of checking out from 
svn,I can build it successfully,maybe the wrong thing I did is that 
before exec ./configure,I had executed 'autoconf' and make someting goes 
wrong.
Posted by Daniel Roux (Guest)
on 31.01.2009 21:11
(Received via mailing list)
Thanks to everybody involved, for all the effort you put into this, for
making my favorite language better.
Congratulations to all the community.
Posted by Damjan Rems (ther)
on 31.01.2009 22:26
Domo arigato

by
TheR
Posted by Charles L. (aquasync)
on 01.02.2009 04:17
This is great - nice work by the ruby team!

In updating one of my gems for 1.9 compatability, I came across this 
behaviour (which I don't believe I've seen noted in the other changes 
lists), and just wanted to find out if it is expected:

$ irb
>> a = *[1]; p a
=> 1
>>
$ irb1.9
>> a = *[1]; p a
=> [1]
>>

Regards,

Charles
Posted by Jayce Meade (Guest)
on 01.02.2009 07:40
(Received via mailing list)
You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.

http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but 
my
browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

-jayce

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:10 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: Win32 Binary errors
Posted by Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner (wonado)
on 01.02.2009 14:22
Jayce Meade wrote:
> You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
> Porting Libraries to Win32.
> 
> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but 
> my
> browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to 
lost packages.

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner
Posted by WATANABE Hirofumi (Guest)
on 01.02.2009 15:00
(Received via mailing list)
Hi,

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner wrote:
> Jayce Meade wrote:
>> You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
>> Porting Libraries to Win32.
>>
>> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but 
>> my
>> browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?
> 
> I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to 
> lost packages.

The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
Wait patiently.
Posted by Heesob Park (phasis)
on 01.02.2009 15:19
(Received via mailing list)
2009/2/1 WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@os.rim.or.jp>:
>>
>> I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to
>> lost packages.
>
> The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
> Wait patiently.
>
> --
> eban
>
>
For the time being, you can download the required dll files at
http://121.78.227.9/ruby-dll/


Regards,

Park Heesob
Posted by Matthias Tarasiewicz (parasew)
on 01.02.2009 22:08
hi list,
we are currently preparing Ruby 1.9.1-p0 and 1.8.7-p72 binary packages 
for Mac OSX (Leopard, Tiger, Panther and below also supported). I'll 
keep you all posted when the final packages are ready.
Project page: http://rubyosx.com

regards,
matthias
Posted by Ollivier Robert (Guest)
on 03.02.2009 10:45
(Received via mailing list)
In article 
<b37300880901300943r635f468dj1ed94ad869c639c7@mail.gmail.com>,
Gregory Brown  <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
>A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on
>release management, Yugui.

Kudos to the team!

>Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar
>to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims?
>This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.

I second that.
Posted by Ubaldo Villaseca (bado)
on 10.02.2009 01:11
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp> 
wrote:
> series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
>
>  SIZE:   9025004 bytes
> - -- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
> UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
> =fAek
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Hi,
I'm a kind of confused. It seem as this is the first production
release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.
Do I need to wait for a final production release (somethin new for me)
or it is www.ruby-lang.org update issue.

Thanks,
Ubaldo
Posted by James Gray (bbazzarrakk)
on 10.02.2009 02:54
(Received via mailing list)
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Ubaldo Villaseca wrote:

> It seem as this is the first production
> release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
> distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
> 1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.

Sorry.  I have updated the link now.

James Edward Gray II
Posted by Marco Mastrodonato (marcomd)
on 31.03.2009 10:40
I want to thank all ruby team for this great work.
If i can say it, i'd like to have an installer for windows as it was for 
the old 1.8.6