Issue #4731 has been reported by Roger Pack. ---------------------------------------- Bug #4731: ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4731 Author: Roger Pack Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-05-18 trunk 31614) [i386-mingw32] as reported originally with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... basically mingw builds fail with $ ruby -S irb and always have, at least for the 1.9 branches. $ ruby -S irb ruby: No such file or directory -- irb (LoadError)
on 2011-05-18 18:30
on 2011-06-11 09:59
Issue #4731 has been updated by Koichi Sasada. Status changed from Open to Assigned Assignee set to Nobuyoshi Nakada ---------------------------------------- Bug #4731: ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4731 Author: Roger Pack Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada Category: Target version: ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-05-18 trunk 31614) [i386-mingw32] as reported originally with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... basically mingw builds fail with $ ruby -S irb and always have, at least for the 1.9 branches. $ ruby -S irb ruby: No such file or directory -- irb (LoadError)
on 2011-07-15 04:12
Issue #4731 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada. Status changed from Assigned to Feedback I can't reproduce it. Is irb only a batch file, or an exe file? ---------------------------------------- Bug #4731: ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4731 Author: Roger Pack Status: Feedback Priority: Normal Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada Category: Target version: ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-05-18 trunk 31614) [i386-mingw32] as reported originally with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... basically mingw builds fail with $ ruby -S irb and always have, at least for the 1.9 branches. $ ruby -S irb ruby: No such file or directory -- irb (LoadError)
on 2011-07-15 14:29
Issue #4731 has been updated by Luis Lavena. Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote: > I can't reproduce it. > Is irb only a batch file, or an exe file? After `make install` the end result in the indicated prefix is a series of batch files like: irb.bat which contains a mix of windows commands and the Ruby script in it, which is then fired using `ruby -x` On RubyInstaller we replaced that with plain stubs and the original scripts from Ruby's source code, see here: https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... https://github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/blob/mas... This workaround was implemented so `ruby -S irb` works. ---------------------------------------- Bug #4731: ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4731 Author: Roger Pack Status: Feedback Priority: Normal Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada Category: Target version: ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-05-18 trunk 31614) [i386-mingw32] as reported originally with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... basically mingw builds fail with $ ruby -S irb and always have, at least for the 1.9 branches. $ ruby -S irb ruby: No such file or directory -- irb (LoadError)
on 2011-07-16 12:47
Hi, At Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:28:50 +0900, Luis Lavena wrote in [ruby-core:38075]: > On RubyInstaller we replaced that with plain stubs and the > original scripts from Ruby's source code, see here: I see. There is only irb.bat, not irb sans the suffix. In that sense, it's natural to fail, but maybe unexpected behavior. Now I'm thinking to make -S option search with .bat (and .cmd too) suffix if it is not found. How do you feel about this? diff --git a/ruby.c b/ruby.c index 93b12d8..b8258ea 100644 --- a/ruby.c +++ b/ruby.c @@ -1288,14 +1288,42 @@ process_options(int argc, char **argv, struct cmdline_options *opt) } else if (opt->do_search) { char *path = getenv("RUBYPATH"); +#ifdef DOSISH + char *batch = NULL; + size_t batchlen = 0; +#endif opt->script = 0; if (path) { opt->script = dln_find_file_r(argv[0], path, fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); } +#ifdef DOSISH if (!opt->script) { - opt->script = dln_find_file_r(argv[0], getenv(PATH_ENV), fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); + batchlen = strlen(argv[0]); + batch = ALLOC_N(char, batchlen + 5); + memcpy(batch, argv[0], batchlen); + memcpy(batch + batchlen, ".bat", 5); + opt->script = dln_find_file_r(batch, path, fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); + if (!opt->script) { + memcpy(batch + batchlen, ".cmd", 5); + opt->script = dln_find_file_r(batch, path, fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); + } + } +#endif + if (!opt->script && (path = getenv(PATH_ENV)) != NULL) { + opt->script = dln_find_file_r(argv[0], path, fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); } +#ifdef DOSISH + if (!opt->script) { + memcpy(batch + batchlen, ".bat", 5); + opt->script = dln_find_file_r(batch, path, fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); + if (!opt->script) { + memcpy(batch + batchlen, ".cmd", 5); + opt->script = dln_find_file_r(batch, path, fbuf, sizeof(fbuf)); + } + } + if (batch) xfree(batch); +#endif if (!opt->script) opt->script = argv[0]; }
on 2011-07-16 22:23
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > > I see. There is only irb.bat, not irb sans the suffix. In > that sense, it's natural to fail, but maybe unexpected > behavior. Now I'm thinking to make -S option search with .bat > (and .cmd too) suffix if it is not found. How do you feel > about this? > Thank you Nakada-san, I see a few drawbacks with this approach: * For a missing script (e.g. foo), system will attempt to find two extra "foo.bat" and "foo.cmd" in all portions of PATH, which will be expensive. * It will introduce a platform-specific discrepancy that other implementations will either need to implement or indicate that are not compatible. I would like to understand why original script is merged with the batchfile stub in tools/rbinstall.rb Perhaps we can remove that? The only reason I see with this is PowerShell, which finds the extensionless script prior the .bat one and attempts to execute it (dunno why, but that is what it tries). For users with PowerShell I've always recommend them use "ruby -S script" instead. Thank you for your time.
on 2011-07-21 16:08
Hi, At Sun, 17 Jul 2011 05:22:32 +0900, Luis Lavena wrote in [ruby-core:38108]: > I would like to understand why original script is merged with the > batchfile stub in tools/rbinstall.rb > > Perhaps we can remove that? Removing the stub, or splitting to a batch file and a script file? > The only reason I see with this is PowerShell, which finds the > extensionless script prior the .bat one and attempts to execute it > (dunno why, but that is what it tries). The reason is just that one file is handier than two files. I know nothing about PowerShell.
on 2011-07-21 16:12
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > file? > Splitting to back and script file. >> The only reason I see with this is PowerShell, which finds the >> extensionless script prior the .bat one and attempts to execute it >> (dunno why, but that is what it tries). > > The reason is just that one file is handier than two files. What particular thing are you doing with the files? If I move I move the entire directory. Thank you.
on 2013-01-25 22:49
Issue #4731 has been updated by drbrain (Eric Hodel). Luis, Nobu, what is the status of this? ---------------------------------------- Bug #4731: ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4731#change-35651 Author: rogerdpack (Roger Pack) Status: Feedback Priority: Normal Assignee: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) Category: Target version: ruby -v: - as reported originally with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... basically mingw builds fail with $ ruby -S irb and always have, at least for the 1.9 branches. $ ruby -S irb ruby: No such file or directory -- irb (LoadError)
on 2013-01-25 23:10
Issue #4731 has been updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena). Status changed from Feedback to Assigned Assignee changed from nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) to luislavena (Luis Lavena) drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote: > Luis, Nobu, what is the status of this? I proposed an alternate rbinstall.rb method in #6769 that will correct this issue. However, workload has been high and code in rbinstall.rb is not very clear. ---------------------------------------- Bug #4731: ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4731#change-35664 Author: rogerdpack (Roger Pack) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: luislavena (Luis Lavena) Category: Target version: ruby -v: - as reported originally with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... basically mingw builds fail with $ ruby -S irb and always have, at least for the 1.9 branches. $ ruby -S irb ruby: No such file or directory -- irb (LoadError)
Enable email notification
Enable multi-page viewPlease log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.