Ruby Forum RSpec > rspec gem vs "rspec plugin" vs "rspec-rails plugin" ???

Posted by Greg Hauptmann (Guest)
on 07.11.2008 09:58
(Received via mailing list)
Hi,

I've got the rspec gem installed, as well as the two plugins "rspec" &
"rspec-rails".  I can't remember which is actual used and which isn't
for my rails app when I go "rake spec"?  Anyone know?

Could I remove either of the core rpec gem OR the "rspec plugin"?  or
do I need all three components?

Tks
Posted by Fernando Perez (fernando)
on 07.11.2008 11:10
Greg Hauptmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've got the rspec gem installed, as well as the two plugins "rspec" &
> "rspec-rails".  I can't remember which is actual used and which isn't
> for my rails app when I go "rake spec"?  Anyone know?
> 
> Could I remove either of the core rpec gem OR the "rspec plugin"?  or
> do I need all three components?
> 
> Tks

The plugins are no longer required, you can only use the rspec and 
rspec-rails gems. For a rails app you will simply have to run 
"script/generate rspec" to generate a few files, and then you are all 
set.
Posted by Greg Hauptmann (Guest)
on 07.11.2008 11:53
(Received via mailing list)
so just to be clear are you saying:

* rspec gem => All that is need for Ruby on Rails Rspec work
* 'rspec plugin' => not needed (functionality in gem)
* 'rspec-rails' plugin => not needed (functionality in gem)

is this right?

thanks again
Posted by aslak hellesoy (Guest)
on 07.11.2008 12:59
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Greg Hauptmann
<greg.hauptmann.ruby@gmail.com> wrote:
> so just to be clear are you saying:
>
> * rspec gem => All that is need for Ruby on Rails Rspec work
> * 'rspec plugin' => not needed (functionality in gem)
> * 'rspec-rails' plugin => not needed (functionality in gem)
>
> is this right?
>

Not quite

rspec gem or plugin => basic rspec without rails support (runner, rake
task, api for describe/it, should etc)
rspec-rails gem or plugin => extra support for rails model view and
controller, database integration, code generation (script/generate)

It doesn't matter whether you use the gem or the plugin. Just pick one
that suits your team.
(If you use the plugin you don't have to worry about people having
different versions installed, but it's alittle more work to install)

Aslak
Posted by aslak hellesoy (Guest)
on 07.11.2008 13:00
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:56 PM, aslak hellesoy
<aslak.hellesoy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not quite
>
> rspec gem or plugin => basic rspec without rails support (runner, rake
> task, api for describe/it, should etc)
> rspec-rails gem or plugin => extra support for rails model view and
> controller, database integration, code generation (script/generate)
>

forgot to clarify - for rails development you'll need both rspec and
rspec-rails.
Posted by Fernando Perez (fernando)
on 07.11.2008 13:16
> forgot to clarify - for rails development you'll need both rspec and
> rspec-rails.

What I meant is that you can go plugin-less, you just have to install 
the two following gems: rspec and rspec-rails, then bootstrap your app 
by generating a few files. And your set.

I personally prefer using gems than plugins.
Posted by Greg Hauptmann (Guest)
on 08.11.2008 00:21
(Received via mailing list)
oh, I hadn't known there was a "rspec-rails" gem.  Thanks