Hi can I access session variable in model? I have in the user controller code session[:site_id] = @the_site.site_id And how can i access this in one of my active record model SDAttachment?I tried like site_id=session[:site_id] but this gives error. Please help Sijo
on 2008-07-25 08:16
on 2008-07-25 10:22
no, you can't If you need information from the session hash in a model, you must hand it to the models method like: def do_something(session_id) ... end and call that from the controller like @my_model.do_something(session[:site_id])
on 2008-07-25 15:58
Thorsten Mueller wrote: > no, you can't > Well, you _can_, but it's not as straight forward as you'd like. You can use Thread.current and store things similarly as you do with session. I don't know the ramifications of doing this with very much data, though. This thread http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/154820#new mentions it. A Google search will probably turn up a bit of useful information. Peace, Phillip
on 2008-07-25 16:01
Not to mention it completely violates MVC. So even if you find out how... It's not a good idea. RSL On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Phillip Koebbe
on 2008-07-26 17:48
Hi
I have a attachment model and I use upload_column to upload files.It
is working ..Now In ServiceDeskAttachment class i have
upload_column :attachment, :store_dir => proc{|inst, attachment|
"uploads/servicedesk/#{@company_name}/#{inst.id}"} # This is not
working
My controller code for attachment is
@service_desk_attachment1=
ServiceDeskAttachment.new(params[:service_desk_attachment1])
@service_desk_attachment1.company_name=session[:company] #this i
tried like from one of above reply
@service_desk_attachment1.save
The in ServiceDeskAttachment class
def set_company(company)
@company_name=company
puts 'in set_company'+ company_name.to_s #Value I get here
end
But @company_name how can I set this to the above upload_column so
that it looks like
upload_column :attachment, :store_dir => proc{|inst, attachment|
"uploads/servicedesk/company1/#{inst.id}"}
Please help
Sijo
on 2008-07-26 18:28
Yes you could access the session variable in model. Paste the below
code in application.rb
--------------
around_filter :you_dont_have_bloody_clue
protected
def you_dont_have_bloody_clue
klasses = [ActiveRecord::Base, ActiveRecord::Base.class]
methods = ["session", "cookies", "params", "request"]
methods.each do |shenanigan|
oops = instance_variable_get(:"@_#{shenanigan}")
klasses.each do |klass|
klass.send(:define_method, shenanigan, proc { oops })
end
end
yield
methods.each do |shenanigan|
klasses.each do |klass|
klass.send :remove_method, shenanigan
end
end
end
--------------
Now continue using the session variable in model. It works for me.
Thanks,
Sadeesh.
On Jul 25, 11:16 am, Sijo Kg <rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net> wrote:
> Hi
> can I access session variable in model?
I have in the user controller
on 2008-07-26 18:41
Hi
Lots of thanks for your help.It is working now..But what actaully
happened? I have the curiosity to know that..Is it anything against the
MVC architecture? And will it create any future problems during
deployment like that?
Thanks
Sijo
on 2008-07-27 03:38
Hi, Probably no problem comes.I am not sure. Its your responsibilty. And you could access all these variables there ["session", "cookies", "params", "request"] . Thanks, Sadeesh.
on 2008-07-27 05:30
Hi -- On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Sijo Kg wrote: > > Hi > Lots of thanks for your help.It is working now..But what actaully > happened? I have the curiosity to know that..Is it anything against the > MVC architecture? And will it create any future problems during > deployment like that? If you're talking about the code with "you_dont_have_bloody_clue" and so forth, don't use it. It was some kind of joke, I believe. The model has no concept of a "session". It shouldn't be able to tell whether it's being accessed from a controller or the console or a standalone script. It's only the controller that knows about sessions. As another respondent said, if you need the model to have session data, you should write your model method to take an argument and then pass the relevant session data in. The model doesn't know where the method argument comes from, and it shouldn't know. David -- Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light: * Advancing With Rails August 18-21 Edison, NJ * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!
on 2008-07-28 05:55
Hi
The code is not a joke .It is working anyway..And I tried as you
said.(5 th post above)..In the model ServiceDeskAttachment i made a
attr_accessor :company
And from controller I wrote
@sd_attachment=ServiceDeskAttachment.new(params[:attachment_data])
@sd_attachment.company=session[:company]
@sd_attachment.save
And in ServiceDeskAttacment model I I have the following code at top
upload_column :attachment, :store_dir => proc{|inst, attachment|
"uploads/servicedesk/#{@company}/#{inst.id}"}
But this does not get @company value...If I get value there, then my
problem is solved..Could you please tell me how can this be solved?
Thanks in advance
sijo
on 2008-07-28 06:26
On Jul 27, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Sijo Kg wrote: > And in ServiceDeskAttacment model I I have the following code at top > upload_column :attachment, :store_dir => proc{|inst, attachment| > "uploads/servicedesk/#{@company}/#{inst.id}"} > > But this does not get @company value...If I get value there, then my > problem is solved..Could you please tell me how can this be solved? The whole thing is just not a good idea. If your model needs external data, then pass it in. When classes have direct access to things that do not belong to them then you're building a house of cards. If you have a model that needs some external data, then pass it in as an argument.
on 2008-07-28 16:58
Hi -- On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Sijo Kg wrote: > > Hi > The code is not a joke .It is working anyway..And I tried as you Sorry. I assumed it was a joke, and not a very nice one, because of the whimsical method and variable names (like "you_dont_have_a_clue" and so forth). If it's not a joke, then I would still say it's not a good idea to try to make the model automatically aware of the concept of "session". David -- Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light: * Advancing With Rails August 18-21 Edison, NJ * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!
on 2008-07-29 15:58
http://m.onkey.org/2007/10/17/how-to-access-sessio... I don't think the message could have been any cleaerer. But if it helps. let me say it again as the original author of that code : DO NOT USE IT. On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:57 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote: > the whimsical method and variable names (like "you_dont_have_a_clue" > * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner > See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates! > > > > -- Cheers! - Pratik http://m.onkey.org
on 2008-07-29 18:36
Hi -- On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Pratik wrote: >> Sorry. I assumed it was a joke, and not a very nice one, because of > > I don't think the message could have been any cleaerer. But if it > helps. let me say it again as the original author of that code : DO > NOT USE IT. I take back the "not a very nice one" thing, which had to do with my thinking that the method and variable names were being hurled at a particular person. I'm not sure "nice" describes the original, but neither does "not nice." Its niceness is nil, rather than false :-) (And the message certainly looks clear to me.) David -- Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light: * Advancing With Rails August 18-21 Edison, NJ * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!
on 2008-07-29 19:05
Hey David, Sorry, I didn't mean to quote you ( just pressed gmail reply button ). My message was not for you, but for the people using the code :) On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:36 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote: >>> >>> > thinking that the method and variable names were being hurled at a > * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner > See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates! > > > > -- Cheers! - Pratik http://m.onkey.org
on 2010-06-29 19:37
Hi, I have a scenario where the session variable is handy in the model - I need to be able to get the current value, as it may be changed at any time. I have a delayed_job that runs a long running model activity (calling multiple web services, populating the database, etc.) in the background. This is triggered when a user selects an item from a list in the UI. However, if the user clicks on another item, I want the current processing to stop, as I want to keep the delayed_job worker pool as free as possible (the more the jobs, the more I am billed by the hoster). The only way I can see to achieve this is to set a session variable (session[:current_topic_id]) when the user clicks on a topic, and then check in each stage of the model action if the current topic is the same as the one stored in the session, and abort the long job if they are out of sync. Here, passing in the session variable to the model method wont really work for me, I have to pass in the session id and check the variable value across the model code. Thanks Anand Pratik Naik wrote: > Hey David, > > Sorry, I didn't mean to quote you ( just pressed gmail reply button ). > My message was not for you, but for the people using the code :) > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:36 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> > wrote: >>>> >>>> >> thinking that the method and variable names were being hurled at a >> * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner >> See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates! >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Cheers! > - Pratik > http://m.onkey.org
on 2010-07-01 00:04
Sadeesh Viswanthan wrote: > Yes you could access the session variable in model. Paste the below > code in application.rb > -------------- > around_filter :you_dont_have_bloody_clue > > protected > > def you_dont_have_bloody_clue > klasses = [ActiveRecord::Base, ActiveRecord::Base.class] > methods = ["session", "cookies", "params", "request"] > > methods.each do |shenanigan| > oops = instance_variable_get(:"@_#{shenanigan}") > > klasses.each do |klass| > klass.send(:define_method, shenanigan, proc { oops }) > end > end > > yield > > methods.each do |shenanigan| > klasses.each do |klass| > klass.send :remove_method, shenanigan > end > end > > end > -------------- > > Now continue using the session variable in model. It works for me. > Thanks, > Sadeesh. If I had a programmer working on my team and I ran across code like this, well he wouldn't be working on my team long. Just saying. I am firmly rooted in the camp where model code is decoupled from external data such as session, request or whatever else is the responsibility of the View or Controller layers.
on 2010-07-01 22:18
I tried passing the session id around to the model, and agree that it is very ugly. I am curious to know how you can best achieve this scenario without passing in the session variable: abort a delayed_job (or other model based) work item when user changes something - this is mainly required because delayed job workers cost money at my host (heroku) and if the user randomly clicks around on the UI, I dont want to be billed for all the spawned jobs that no one cares about anyway. Thanks Anand
on 2012-11-20 05:40
We can do that with attr_accessor In model attr_accessible :site_id attr_accessor :site_id in form, add a hidden field like this =f.site_id, value; session[:site_id] in model we can use self.site_id now.
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.