Hi Everyone Just a brief update on the Summer Reboot Documentation project. I just spent a couple of hours copying and moving stuff to the site from a couple of places to pull things into the project :) Brief Update: * 6 Authors have signed up * 5 Articles have been provided (in some form or the other) * A further 11 subjects have been claimed Link to the main page: http://wiki.radiantcms.org/Summer_Reboot Looking forward to a few more comments and articles when people get the time. Just a reminder: we're targeting end of August 2008. Cheers, Mohit. 7/12/2008 | 2:26 AM.
on 11.07.2008 20:28
on 16.07.2008 19:40
Mohit Sindhwani wrote: > Just a brief update on the Summer Reboot Documentation project. I just > spent a couple of hours copying and moving stuff to the site from a > couple of places to pull things into the project :) My schedule hasn't gone according to plan so far this summer, but I hope to attack this after I return home from vacation starting Friday the 25th. - Dave
on 17.07.2008 19:33
Hi All, Sorry for being late to the party. I originally posted to the list on May 2nd about documentation ($B!H(Btag documentation feedback$B!I(B), mentioning among other things a tag reference. This would have one page per tag, be in a wiki, and hopefully auto-import the current $B!H(Bavailable tags$B!I(B documentation from the code (would it be possible to script that?). I$B!G(Bve added this to the summer reboot wiki page as an appendix. Currently the summer reboot documentation ToC is kind of book-like, in that a user would start at the start (or a chapter/topic of interest) and read linearly to the end. I$B!G(Bd also like to suggest we support reference style, for example the tag reference docs, and problem-solving style (how-to articles), for example short code example articles on one topic; how to implement blog-style categories using <r:aggregate />, how to produce common variants of monthly archive lists etc. Currently the docs are a little repetitive or fractured in places, for example tag information is spread over four places on the wiki and blog, so we should also think how to avoid repeating content too much. For tags I$B!G(Bd propose putting the most detail into a tag reference, and having eg the $B!H(BUsing the built-in tags$B!I(B article be an overview grouped by topic with examples, with links to the tag reference and how-to articles for more detail. I think that putting the detail into atomic reference pages will make it easier to keep the main documentation articles light and quick to read, and help reduce repetition. I$B!G(Bm happy to flesh out the tag documentation and add examples, but someone else will need to write the script to automatically generate/update wiki pages using the available tags text. If such a script is impractical I$B!G(Bll start doing it manually if a tag reference header page is created. Some reference for how others do this: Movable Type: http://www.movabletype.org/documentation/appendices/tags/ Expression Engine: http://expressionengine.com/docs/overview/tags.html WordPress: http://codex.wordpress.org/Template_Tags These things would be nice for the tag reference: * best practice code examples, with expected results * code coloring in code examples * links to related tags, how-to articles that use this tag, and relevant part of tag overview article and other documentation * a link in the Radiant admin $B!H(Bavailable tags$B!I(B documentation to the more detailed tag reference page on the wiki Finally it would be great if there was automatic linking of how-to articles and tag reference pages, ie if a how-to article on monthly archive lists has a code example with r:children:each, r:find, r:date and r:header, that it would automatically link to those tag reference pages, and in turn the how-to article would be linked to on each relevant tag reference page. hope that$B!G(Bs of some use peace - oli
on 17.07.2008 19:53
On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Oli Studholme wrote: > I’m happy to flesh out the tag documentation and add examples, but > someone else will need to write the script to automatically generate/ > update wiki pages using the available tags text. If such a script is > impractical I’ll start doing it manually if a tag reference header > page is created. The Help extension does this for you when you install it. Even better, it gives you documentation for all installed tags and to which page types they apply. http://github.com/saturnflyer/radiant-help-extension/tree/master It does not, however, provide examples beyond what comes with the tag descriptions.
on 21.07.2008 15:20
On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > http://github.com/saturnflyer/radiant-help-extension/tree/master > > It does not, however, provide examples beyond what comes with the > tag descriptions. I just added http://github.com/saturnflyer/radiant-help_use_cases-extension/tree/master So your extra documentation could be added in as an option (although this still isn't as non-technical as editing a wiki) It has almost nothing in it, but I added the ability to extend the docs for the installed tags in Help http://github.com/saturnflyer/radiant-help-extension/commit/d9a4634724465ca115bd0f246b4665917efbe724 (thanks Sean) This will allow extension developers to add help use cases to their tags outside of the description in the model. My priority is to flesh out the features and documentation of Help, but I'll be adding more info to Help Use Cases as time goes on. If you are interested in writing docs for each tag, I'll gladly grab it and put it into Help Use Cases. -Jim Jim Gay http://www.saturnflyer.com
on 22.07.2008 16:36
David Piehler wrote: > > - Dave > Thanks Dave, Every drop counts! :) We still have FIVE weeks to go! Cheers, Mohit. 7/22/2008 | 10:14 PM.