Hello, Apologies if I'm posting in the wrong place - I wasn't sure how else to inform whoever is able to update api.rubyonrails.org. Seems like it hasn't been updated for 2.1 yet? Jeff
on 2008-06-17 19:13
on 2008-06-18 22:31
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Jeff <cohen.jeff@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies if I'm posting in the wrong place - I wasn't sure how else > to inform whoever is able to update api.rubyonrails.org. Seems like > it hasn't been updated for 2.1 yet? I don't know what happens, but in the meantime, the docs generated straight from docrails are available here: http://docs.rails.info/ Take into account docrails documents edge, though. I'd love to see the official API updated, there's a good amount of work waiting to see the light.
on 2008-06-19 08:15
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Chris Kampmeier
<ChrisGKampmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the ticket: http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/357
I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs.
Best,
jeremy
on 2008-06-19 09:46
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>
wrote:
> I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs.
Great!
named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc
and no #:nodoc:. Isn't that suspicious?
on 2008-06-19 17:30
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote: > >> I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs. > > Great! > > named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc > and no #:nodoc:. Isn't that suspicious? Hmm. I see it in that frame. jeremy