Forum: Rails-core (closed, excessive spam) Online API docs not updated?

Posted by Jeff Cohen (jeff)
on 2008-06-17 19:13
(Received via mailing list)
Hello,

Apologies if I'm posting in the wrong place - I wasn't sure how else
to inform whoever is able to update api.rubyonrails.org.  Seems like
it hasn't been updated for 2.1 yet?

Jeff
Posted by Xavier Noria (fxn)
on 2008-06-18 22:31
(Received via mailing list)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Jeff <cohen.jeff@gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies if I'm posting in the wrong place - I wasn't sure how else
> to inform whoever is able to update api.rubyonrails.org.  Seems like
> it hasn't been updated for 2.1 yet?

I don't know what happens, but in the meantime, the docs generated
straight from docrails are available here:

   http://docs.rails.info/

Take into account docrails documents edge, though.

I'd love to see the official API updated, there's a good amount of
work waiting to see the light.
Posted by Craig Demyanovich (Guest)
on 2008-06-19 03:05
(Received via mailing list)
http://www.railsbrain.com has the 2.1 docs. It's pretty nice.

Regards,
Craig
Posted by Chris Kampmeier (Guest)
on 2008-06-19 03:35
(Received via mailing list)
Posted by Jeremy Kemper (Guest)
on 2008-06-19 08:15
(Received via mailing list)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Chris Kampmeier
<ChrisGKampmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the ticket: http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/357

I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs.

Best,
jeremy
Posted by Xavier Noria (fxn)
on 2008-06-19 09:46
(Received via mailing list)
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> 
wrote:

> I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs.

Great!

named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc
and no #:nodoc:. Isn't that suspicious?
Posted by Jeremy Kemper (Guest)
on 2008-06-19 17:30
(Received via mailing list)
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
>
>> I generated and uploaded the current 2.1 docs.
>
> Great!
>
> named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc
> and no #:nodoc:. Isn't that suspicious?

Hmm. I see it in that frame.

jeremy
Posted by Xavier Noria (fxn)
on 2008-06-19 17:49
(Received via mailing list)
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> 
wrote:

>> named_scope does not appear in the frame with methods, but it has rdoc
>> and no #:nodoc:. Isn't that suspicious?
>
> Hmm. I see it in that frame.

Yes, me too now. Good!
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.