Ruby Forum RSpec > Which rspec for rails 2.1RC1?

Posted by Rick Denatale (rdenatale)
on 16.05.2008 17:42
(Received via mailing list)
I'm working on porting our app. Do I need to upgrade rspec from 1.1.3?
 If so which version.

BTW the installation doc at
http://rspec.info/documentation/rails/install.html seems to be stuck
in the pre-git days.

--
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Posted by aslak hellesoy (Guest)
on 16.05.2008 22:22
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> I'm working on porting our app. Do I need to upgrade rspec from 1.1.3?
>  If so which version.
>

1.1.3 might work - we're not systematically testing old version
against newer versions of Rails. If it doesn't work, try the latest
code in Git.

> BTW the installation doc at
> http://rspec.info/documentation/rails/install.html seems to be stuck
> in the pre-git days.
>

That's because there hasn't been a release since we were on subversion.
Posted by Rick Denatale (rdenatale)
on 17.05.2008 00:23
(Received via mailing list)
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:19 PM, aslak hellesoy
<aslak.hellesoy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

>> BTW the installation doc at
>> http://rspec.info/documentation/rails/install.html seems to be stuck
>> in the pre-git days.
>>
>
> That's because there hasn't been a release since we were on subversion.

True enough, but it talks about getting the edge version as well as 
releases.

--
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Posted by David Chelimsky (Guest)
on 17.05.2008 03:29
(Received via mailing list)
On May 16, 2008, at 6:21 PM, "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> That's because there hasn't been a release since we were on  
>> subversion.
>
> True enough, but it talks about getting the edge version as well as  
> releases.

We maintain the website with source, so when we release 1.1.4 we'll
update the website.