I found that Ruby/GConf2 is interesting and very useful. I had compiled it and tried on windows and it works well. (At least it can run the example in the GConf2 tutorial - http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.jp/hiki.cgi?tut-gconf) How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program? I hope it can include in the next windows installer release. Is someone working on building the new windows installer release?
on 04.05.2008 16:09
on 05.05.2008 11:28
> How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program?
I dont use it. Reason is I am not sure what to do with it.
With a Gtk Window I know what to do :) but with gconf... it is
just something akin to a registry, for Gnome, isn't it?
on 05.05.2008 20:46
Am Sonntag, den 04.05.2008, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Shin guey Wong:
> How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program?
ppl???
detlef
on 06.05.2008 03:00
Detlef Reichl wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 04.05.2008, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Shin guey Wong: >> How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program? > > ppl??? > > detlef OK, my english is not that good... may be I should ask 'anyone' use GConf2 in their GTK program...
on 06.05.2008 04:38
Hi, On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Detlef Reichl <detlef.reichl@gmx.org> wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 04.05.2008, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Shin guey Wong: > > How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program? > > ppl??? > It's a colloquial shortening of "people". > detlef > Arlen
on 06.05.2008 04:43
tis 2008-05-06 klockan 03:00 +0200 skrev Shin guey Wong: > Detlef Reichl wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 04.05.2008, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Shin guey Wong: > >> How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program? > > > > ppl??? > > > > detlef > > OK, my english is not that good... > may be I should ask 'anyone' use GConf2 in their GTK program... People do, yes. It is a pretty good solution to the problem of storing and setting preferences. You can store and monitor whatever settings you want, and whenever a setting changes externally (say, from an external preferences application or something), you get notified about it in a nice, clean way. The greatest benefit comes from when your desktop (ie. Gnome) is using it; you can monitor any global preferences (default font, for instance), or other applications preferences that concern you and you'll get notified the moment they change. If this sounds kind of like the Windows registry then you'd be correct. But GConf is the registry done right; the windows registry is a noncodumented, ad-hoc mess of binary settings. GConf is human-readable, well organized and encourages documentation about the settings. If I put it this way: you often need to store your application-specific settings _somehow_, and GConf is a pretty simple, clean method of doing so even if you don't make use of its more advanced features. -- Jan Morén Japan: 090-3622 8920 http://janneinosaka.blogspot.com
on 06.05.2008 19:16
Am Dienstag, den 06.05.2008, 03:00 +0200 schrieb Shin guey Wong: > Detlef Reichl wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 04.05.2008, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Shin guey Wong: > >> How many ppl use GConf2 when writing Gtk program? > > > > ppl??? > > > > detlef > > OK, my english is not that good... me too ;-) > may be I should ask 'anyone' use GConf2 in their GTK program... Yes, I do. It is very handy to store data on per application base. Many programs use it in this way, that they show only the common configuration options in the preferences dialog but allow additional tweeking of many setting via gconf and the gconf editor. So you can keep your applications simple but give "power users" the possibility to adopt it better to there needs. The only thing that is missing for now (agianst the C version) is the possibility to store lists. Cheers, detlef