Ruby Forum Typo > Re: Caching problems with Typo 5.0.2

Posted by Paul Carey (Guest)
on 30.01.2008 00:21
(Received via mailing list)
I deleted everything in typo/public that had a datestamp after the
installation time. Nothing seems to be cached erroneously any longer.
Regards
Paul
Posted by Paul Carey (Guest)
on 02.02.2008 20:14
(Received via mailing list)
Hi

I'm still seeing caching issues that puzzle me, but maybe what I see is
expected behaviour.

After installing typo and publishing an article, the contents of the 
blog
landing page are written to public/index.html. However, after I modify 
the
article and save, public/index.html is not updated and old content is
served. Is this correct?

Similarly, after publishing the first article I checked Article and 
Comments
on the Syndication plugin. Pages that I hadn't previously accessed 
display
the sidebar correctly. Those that I accessed before updating the plugin 
do
not contain the feed links.

On my previous installation I had observed similar behaviour and so 
deleted
out-of-date files from the public dir. This fixed the caching issue but
pages were never written out to disk again.

Clicking Empty Fragment Cache, running typo sweep_cache and rake 
sweep_cache
have had no effect.

I'd be very grateful if someone could point out whether this behaviour 
is as
expected, or whether I might have mis-configured something.

Kind regards

Paul
Posted by Kevin Williams (k-dub)
on 02.02.2008 22:30
(Received via mailing list)
I turned caching off alltogether, and now my Typo seems to run fine. :(

On Feb 2, 2008 12:13 PM, Paul Carey <paul.p.carey@gmail.com> wrote:
> Similarly, after publishing the first article I checked Article and Comments
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Typo-list mailing list
> Typo-list@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
>



--
Cheers,

Kevin Williams
http://www.bantamtech.com/
http://www.almostserio.us/
http://kevwil.com/
Posted by Piers Cawley (Guest)
on 04.02.2008 10:52
(Received via mailing list)
On Feb 2, 2008 7:13 PM, Paul Carey <paul.p.carey@gmail.com> wrote:
> Similarly, after publishing the first article I checked Article and Comments
>
> I'd be very grateful if someone could point out whether this behaviour is as
> expected, or whether I might have mis-configured something.

Definitely not correct behaviour - I've been short of time to look at
Typo recently, but I'll certainly be looking into these caching issues
as soon as I'm back in the saddle.