Hi–
I’ve gotten a little bit of flack about the name of the “blow”
project. So I was thinking of changing it to something a little more
obvious like “webits”.
What do you all think?
T.
On Dec 26, 2007 11:40 AM, Trans [email protected] wrote:
Hi–
I’ve gotten a little bit of flack about the name of the “blow”
project. So I was thinking of changing it to something a little more
obvious like “webits”.What do you all think?
I think that “webits” is nearly as bad as “blow”. It just a little
too artificial as an English word. It doesn’t decode smoothly.
Kirk H.
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 10:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Trans [email protected] wrote:
Hi–
I’ve gotten a little bit of flack about the name of the “blow”
project. So I was thinking of changing it to something a little more
obvious like “webits”.What do you all think?
I think you should change it to “blowme”, but that’s just me.
–
Zed A. Shaw
Trans wrote:
Nitro-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
Just out of curiosity, what does “blow” do? 
On Dec 26, 2:55 pm, “M. Edward (Ed) Borasky” [email protected]
wrote:
Nitro-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-generalJust out of curiosity, what does “blow” do?
Blow is a spin-off of Facets. All of Facets’ web-related libraries
were separated out into this project. Turned out to be a good move
actually. It’s already become a much stronger lib. I recently added an
XML DesignKit and I used to create an Atom builder and I’ve almost
finished an RSS builder. Of course there are generic XML and HTML
builders too. It also includes some extensions to URI, an html filter,
a css filter, and more.
T.
On Dec 26, 2:06 pm, “Kirk H.” [email protected] wrote:
I think that “webits” is nearly as bad as “blow”. It just a little
too artificial as an English word. It doesn’t decode smoothly.
Maybe you are right. I just thought of it in terms of having a similar
sound structure to “facets”.
T.
On Dec 26, 2:02 pm, “Zed A. Shaw” [email protected] wrote:
I think you should change it to “blowme”, but that’s just me.
LOL!!! 
blow its ok…
-g.
On Jan 3, 10:09 pm, James B. [email protected] wrote:
chris wrote:
I’ll put my vote in to keep it ‘blow’
Okay then, ‘blow’ it shall stay.
T.
chris wrote:
I’ll put my vote in to keep it ‘blow’
Same here.
James