Hi Devs, Attached is the 'darcs record; darcs send' of my current copy of the repo. It contains the prototype/proof-of-concept of a DBI adapter and Sequel functionality. Fro further info see some of the specs and docs - the Sequel/Og::Model specs have proved tricky to get running all at once and I'm not yet sure what is going on there. Better minds might be able to work this out. Be aware this is in the spirit of 'release-early'. Some changes are at Og's lower levels, e.g. #execute. At the moment _all_ you should expect is that 'rake test:og' should show some passing specs :) In case you wonder 'Why Sequel?', or 'Doesn't Og already do xyz?', the reasons: - Sequel was documented, and I figured it'd be quicker to try spot weld Sequel onto Og than try to 'internalize' Og's code. - Sequel is actively developed, so by keeping as much of the Sequel code-structure I could hopefully tap into the rich vein of code/ideas in that project. - Sequel seemed to offer a natural fit (DataMapper functionality might be able to be incorporated?) Where to? Well I'm not sure... there is no Og issue tracker or wiki so whether, or how anything can be discussed/incorporated into Og remains to be seen. Hopefully an active and vibrant Og community will spring up shortly. Please let me know if I've mangled anything in the attached. Regards Mark
on 2007-12-03 05:13
on 2007-12-03 20:28
On Dec 2, 2007 8:13 PM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Devs, > Attached is the 'darcs record; darcs send' of my current copy of the repo. > > It contains the prototype/proof-of-concept of a DBI adapter and Sequel > functionality. Fro further info see some of the specs and docs > - the Sequel/Og::Model specs have proved tricky to get running all at > once and I'm not yet sure what is going on there. > Better minds might be able to work this out. I'm responding in half-ignorance. Sequel looks like a close cousin of the EZ::Caboose stuff that was absorbed into Og well before my tenure. Could you comment on the differences or similarities between the two? Judson
on 2007-12-04 00:13
To be honest I was completely oblivoious to EZ::Caboose - I'd seen the source file but it set me thinking along the lines of 'laid back North American wildlife'. Seriously, I have no idea. I discovered from the post responding to Trans 'heads-up' about a neat Query implementation that EZ::Caboose does the same thing. I'll look into it when I have some spare time ;) It will be much easier for some one who knows EZ::Caboose to look at the Sequel cheat-sheet/documentation: http://code.google.com/p/ruby-sequel/w/list and pickout any highlights? Mark
on 2007-12-06 16:10
On Dec 2, 11:13 pm, "Mark Van De Vyver" <mvy...@gmail.com> wrote: > at Og's lower levels, e.g. #execute. > might be able to be incorporated?) > > Where to? > Well I'm not sure... there is no Og issue tracker or wiki so whether, > or how anything can be discussed/incorporated into Og remains to be > seen. > Hopefully an active and vibrant Og community will spring up shortly. > > Please let me know if I've mangled anything in the attached. Does Sequel have to be installed? T.
on 2007-12-09 08:12
Apologies for the delay - been away this last week... On Dec 7, 2007 2:06 AM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote: > > once and I'm not yet sure what is going on there. > > - Sequel is actively developed, so by keeping as much of the Sequel > > > > Please let me know if I've mangled anything in the attached. > > Does Sequel have to be installed? No, everything required should be under adpater/dbi HTH? Mark