Forum: Nitro A Q about the 0.50 branch plans

Hi Devs,
Possibly a dumb/naive question...
Will the current branch be merged back into the main darcs repo, or
will the branch become the new repo when 0.50 is relased?

Reason I ask is I've reached a point where I'm starting to think about
'submitting' the Og:DbiAdapter/Sequel 'stuff' I've been working on.
Exactly what to do with this work is a discussion I'll start on another 
thread.

Cheers
Mark

I am thinking about dumping the old history to doc/CHANGELOG and using 
the
branch repo as the new repo.

-g.

On Nov 20, 3:31 am, "George Moschovitis"
<george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am thinking about dumping the old history to doc/CHANGELOG and using the
> branch repo as the new repo.

Let take this as the opportunity to move Og into it's own repo. We can
then tag the current version and create a branch for Mark to apply his
changes. If the changes look good and test out we can merge back to
Og's trunk.

T.

On Nov 20, 8:04 am, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 3:31 am, "George Moschovitis"
>
> <george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am thinking about dumping the old history to doc/CHANGELOG and using the
> > branch repo as the new repo.
>
> Let take this as the opportunity to move Og into it's own repo. We can
> then tag the current version and create a branch for Mark to apply his
> changes. If the changes look good and test out we can merge back to
> Og's trunk.

Actually, to clarify this. I deem it necessary simply b/c (as far as
can tell) darcs only allows for the single "bundle" space. With SVN
you can work on any portion of a directory structure independently of
the rest.

T.

Can you handle this one? :)

-g.

On Nov 21, 2007 7:07 PM, George Moschovitis
<george.moschovitis@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 8:04 am, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Og's trunk.
> >
> > Actually, to clarify this. I deem it necessary simply b/c (as far as
> > can tell) darcs only allows for the single "bundle" space. With SVN
> > you can work on any portion of a directory structure independently of
> > the rest.

Ok, sounds good.  This can wait until after 0.50 is out the door.

Thanks again for all the effort you guys are putting in.

Cheers