Who maintains ruby-talk?

Oh, as for that, Matz blocks spammers on the mailing list, and Google has
spam filtering on its side for the newsgroup. I am not sure about the
forums.

The forum makes a user evaluate a ruby program in order to register.
Which would be ridiculously easy for a bot to do, but it would have to
be targetted specifically at the forum.

Actually, it’s not a very good CAPTCHA at all imo, since it’s
something that is easy for a machine to do and hard for a regular
person to do. But… I’m not in charge. Thank goodness.

-Jonathan N.

For what it’s worth, here’s the response I got after doing the same
thing I
did to Walton. There was no confirmation process, so either something
is
different with how we’re subscribed, or something changed recently:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Subject: fml Command Status report (ruby-talk ML)
To: [email protected]

unsubscribe
set UNSUBSCRIBE => BYE
BYE [[email protected]] accepted.
change member and recipient lists

[email protected], Be Seeing You!


  Help: <mailto:[email protected]?body=help>

Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe

If you have any questions or problems,
please contact [email protected]
or
send e-mail with the body “help”(without quotes) to
[email protected]
(here is the automatic reply, so more preferable)

e.g. on a Unix Machine
(shell prompt)% echo “help” |Mail [email protected]


Good for you for getting a response from the controller! As I stated a
few days ago, all of my attempts to communicate with the MLM
controller from my Gmail account failed. I have yet to run the script.
This should be interesting…


Michael J.

@mjijackson

Walton H. wrote:

I wonder how that could have happened :wink:

Moderator! Ban this person for relentless smart-assitude!

:slight_smile:

BTW, thanks for testing that out.


James B.

www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys
www.ruby-doc.org - Ruby Help & Documentation
www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
www.neurogami.com - Smart application development

Tony A. [email protected] writes:

Hi, yes, you got it right. I read ruby-talk via e-mail. Given my present
method of reading ruby-talk (via Gmail) it’s been extremely distracting and
hindered my ability to read other mailing lists. I use Gmail’s multiple
inbox feature to filter out mailing lists I’m subscribed to, and “high
traffic” threads get priority, even if it’s the same person sending dozens
of messages to a single thread.

Perhaps the method by which you read ruby-talk differs, but given my present
mode of reading the list, thunk threads are eating up valuable second-inbox
space.

You are aware of GMail’s ‘mute conversation’ functionality, yes?

Also, thunk enjoyed making off topic posts to otherwise legitimate
threads.

Yes, unfortunately that doesn’t seem to work correctly with the multiple
inboxes feature.

2010/4/15 Oddmund Strømme [email protected]

James B. wrote:

:slight_smile:

BTW, thanks for testing that out.

Though later discussion has prompted me to test it myself to see what
happens.

I got a confirmation e-mail.

James

James B. wrote:

:slight_smile:

BTW, thanks for testing that out.

Though later discussion has prompted me to test it myself to see what
happens.

James

PreScriptum: in @lists.altlinux.org, we’ve got some form of
informal convention to mark “just talk” as [JT] in Subject:
(e.g. when the question borders offtopic right from the start,
or the discussion wanders a bit too much away, or someone who
does have that feeling “marks” a thread which should be).

We also have formal “offtopic” list (which isn’t anarchist,
its policy and moderator do insist on being polite and using
it for duplex discussions and not simplex yelling). It helps
since in every technical or user support list one can suggest
folks bordering offtopic to move there, and it’s sorta “here”
and not “get off my lawn”.

And a forum was recently added (as usual, list regulars who
coincide to be the more experienced are harder to spot there).

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:39:10PM +0900, Tony A. wrote:

Among other things, the ruby-talk MLM is rampant with security
vulnerabilities, and in need of moderation.

I don’t think so. (being mid-range list reader with dozens
of those, starting last century, a hoster, a moderator,
and ALT Linux Security Team member)

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:32:03PM +0900, Rich McGrath wrote:

Maybe this mailing list might be better suited in a forum.

No, not this, please. Forums vs MLs vs newsgroups is very
old and thoroughly beaten to death horse, no need to implement
another cycle by inlining all the recurring stuff yet again.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:15:10AM +0900, Tony A. wrote:

For what it’s worth, I’ve considered unsubscribing due to the
high volume of off-topic email.

So get yourself a “list vacation” if you please (no insulting,
I do that myself at times!). And come back when you miss it. :slight_smile:

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:35:47AM +0900, Andrea D. wrote:

While the thunk phase’s been pretty annoying it looks like now
it’s over. I suggest to wait a month or so and see if things
get better: if not, then I’m all into taking actions against
spam and OT.

FWIW, I’ve mostly noticed “thunk” messages in spambox.
Was a bit worried but didn’t get around to tracking those.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:48:49PM +0900, Aldric G. wrote:

If you argue with a recent hiccup in favor of getting rid of
a tradition then this is a weak argument in my eyes.
I have the same point of view as Robert. I like ‘us’.

Also note that there’s some correlation with seasons; spring is
particularly known for weird behaviour even on more or less well
behaving folks (lack of vitamins, changing sunlight, etc etc etc).

Ever notice how the worst children will suddenly become great
kids when they get a toy they like? (damn - my analogy breaks
down again. When they get bored, they become ‘terrible’ kids
again!)

Getting away by toys doesn’t really work, yup. Putting a bad one
in a corner did help misbehaving /me back then though.